...To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
...To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;Here's my take on the Rahm proposals....The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;
With regards to firearms and national preparedness, the US government and states have a strong mandate to train and equip. It's something they should be doing.
Most young adults these days do not act the way they do because of an overabundance of discipline. I'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest that if they went to a uncomfortable, martial atmosphere for 3 months, learned to use weapons, learned to apply themselves, and to work with others, the majority would be much better off from the experience.
People CCW a gun because they can not CCW an entire cop. It's an entirely constitutional idea that cities, counties and states be able to have some sort of rudimentary defense structure greater than the typical first responders to pull from. Virginia Tech might have benefited from having more trained good guys with guns working in a coordinated manner, and Los Angeles certainly would have after the Rodney King verdicts.
Before the 2A was enumerated, there was some discussion going on about a select militia vs the current system. What we have isn't bad, it just isn't all that used or organized. Mildly comparable to the old soviet factory work theory. "We pretend to work, they pretend to pay us."
The two points I want to make is that the concept of the militia was never meant to be "no strings attached" and [controversial statement alert] the 2A isn't solely, or even primarily about owning guns.


Reply With Quote

Where are the trillions of dollars coming from for the bailouts/stimuli? Is there a surplus from which they're drawing this cash? No. Are people loaning us this money? No. Has the US government raised taxes to 90%? No. Are they printing money as fast as they can? Yes.
Bookmarks