Originally Posted by
rubberneck
If making empty statements about a products value without any empirical data to support that statement is "eating our own" than I expect more posters to dig in. It's not like the expectation bar is set that high to begin with. If I read a thread extolling the virtues of a firearm than I think I have the reasonable expectation that the person reviewing the product, has at the very least, tried it. If not I might as well stop reading here and spend my time doing something else. I don't know about you but I don't particularly enjoy mental masturbation.
Post 1. OnPointFirearms(Evan) posted that this was the best 1911 for the money.
Post 6: Todd G questioned his review, and rightfully so.
Post 19: OnPointFirearms(Evan) posted that he agreed that if his reviews were not up to spec then he would not post them anymore.
Post 20 and beyond had some good points but some were just piling on in my opinion and that is what my post was directed at. One of those posts has been edited since I made my last post and I actually liked what markm had to say:
...I'd guess that many of us would like to hear how it gobbles up 200-500 rounds.
(p.s. ... don't be butt hurt. it's not sexy. Man up, blast the pistol, and report back.)
From the looks of the gun it's another Phillipine made 1911 with a cast frame and mediocre parts , fit, and finish. Probably a good shooter but not something I would necessarily stake my life on.
"The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." John Steinbeck
Bookmarks