A little TRG-42 and AI-AWSM (Lapua) porn

[Sendero]

Comparing the AICS stock to a SAKO rifle is apples to oranges.

The AICS is a patch so the American market can retrofit new stock/chassis technology to our sporterized commercial actions (Rem700) which stem from a 100-year-old design (Mauser copied into '03).

SAKO does not make a product comparable to the AICS.

A fair comparison is the AI-AW/AWM/AWSM to the TRG-22/42.


TACPRO. And mags aren't $300.


Per the experience in the article (and in the first post), using the stock screw holes in the TRG receiver to mount a Pic rail may not provide the strength to persist with 338LM recoil.

Nice to read you on firearm forum too Mr. Smith, i really like what you write...
I must tell you that i have a TRG-42 in .338 with the NEAR base. After 2340 round and a NF 5.5 - 22 x56 on top, it NEVER came loose yet... But anyway, time will tell us.

The reason i write too is that Richard at Near produce the BEST muzzle brake for the TRG-42, you notice a cloud of dust in your review and you are right but not with the Near brake, the port just don't go UNDER the brake A LA Sako, also, a found the Near to be more easy on recoil as there is 4 wall instead of 3 for the sako.... Hehe, you should review some Near product... Hope you will have the chance, like me, to feel the difference by yourself...


Respectfully

Sendero (Marc)

[Zak Smith]

We only shoot suppressed now.