Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Another of trijicons goodies

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    76
    Feedback Score
    0
    Hmm, seems larger than I expected. What's the weight including Trijicon's own mount? I guess they're going for the Aimpoint micro market the way it's sized and priced.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,166
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Josh-L View Post
    Hey bullitt... could you possibly explain why they are only available with the dinner plate sized dots and not a triangle or chevron? That is my only beef with them.


    dots work better in my book, but thats me
    the dinner plate sized dots are at 100yards and make com hits very easy and fast the 8-9 moa version i tried i would agree that 4-6 moa would be better

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,209
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    Weight on both units is 1.2 oz.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    42
    Feedback Score
    0
    Price? And when will these be available? I'm about to pull the trigger on an H-1 but would love to see these before I do.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,036
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by bullitt5172 View Post
    We are offering two verions, battery only and fiber optic/tritium. Washout won't be an issue with the battery version and will be minimal with the FO/Trit version. This optic has gone through the same testing as our ACOG's, they are tough little units.
    Awesome, just awesome.

    But, for the love of God! Why no chevron reticule?!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    122
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Armati View Post
    Awesome, just awesome.

    But, for the love of God! Why no chevron reticule?!
    Indeed. It seems to me that the chevron would greatly enhance the accuracy at long range. Does it not also give you two aiming points to help with holds at various ranges? I think you guys are missing the boat on this one. Blob shaped dots suck IMHO.

    Mule

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Red Dirt, OK
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    It would appear "why no other choice besides a dot" is the magic question.....

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,209
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    I'm going to wager that their new fibre optic design lends itself to washout prevention in a dot form at the moment.

    I'm completely and totally guessing, but I can only assume that is why their new offerings are foregoing the chevie. I could be very wrong...

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Red Dirt, OK
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I wouldn't think the shape of the reticle would have anything to do with how good the fiber optic system worked. But I don't build them either so....

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    9,209
    Feedback Score
    47 (100%)
    I'm just fancyin' a guess, bro. I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't go for the Chevron, certainly not because of unpopularity of the reticle.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •