Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: "Tactical" 11-87

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Red Dirt, OK
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)

    "Tactical" 11-87

    I'm thinking about building a "fighting/tacticool" semi-auto shotty. A Benelli is more than I want to spend and I have a line on a nice used 11-87. What mod's have you guys done to yours if any? I plan on getting a SF foreend and a shorter stock if they make one. I may register it later and get a 14 inch barrel. Any other suggestions? Pics are always good too. Oh and I also couldn't find a single point sling adaptor either. All of them only said 870. Do they make one for the 11-87 or will the 870 fit it also?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Leetonia, Ohio
    Posts
    1,803
    Feedback Score
    0
    Two of the guys I hunt with both run 11-87's. Neither of the guns has had the kind of reliability I would want for a defensive weapon.
    They run 3" shells through the guns for turkey and deer season. The guns probably see 100-150 rounds a year, this # includes sight in and pattern checking for turkey.
    The guns require a new O ring every year, even with this pm one of the guns is a semi when very very clean and well lubed. This does not last for long in a hunting situation. So Cory automatically reaches up to make sure the bolt has made it all the way into battery after each shot.
    Donald's gun is has had less malf's but his will hit right out of the blue, then not repeat for several days.

    I realize that two guns do not make a signifigant sample, but I would look at saving for a benelli or get an 870, before I trusted my life to an 11-87

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    land o' the Buckeye
    Posts
    160
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've had a couple of "tactical" 11-87s over the years. Here's my advice: If you eventually want to shorten the barrel, stick with a pump gun. I've never seen a short barreled semi auto I would trust my life to.

    If you plan on shooting anything other than full power loads, stick with a pump gun. An 11-87 with a short (23" or less) will not run reliably, if at all, on light loads, even with modifications (opening the gas port). The gas system (unless they've changed it recently) is not designed for light loads.

    On Benelli's: I had a M1 Super 90 "tactical" and it was a nich shotgun, but it didn't like light loads either. One of my best friends uses as short barreled Benelli at wotk and it WON'T run on light loads or even reduced power buchshot, etc.

    They do make shorter stocks for the 11-87 (Speedfeed call them their LE stcoks) and there are single point plates for them (I think they are the same one as 870s).

    If you want a "tactical" semi-auto, look at this:

    http://www.remington.com/pdfs/07catalog-tactical.pdf

    Scroll down and look at the 1100 TAC-4. I'm getting ready to order one as my 3 gun shotgun.

    Good luck.
    "When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over in a different way. Sing your death song, and die like a hero going home." -Chief Tecumseh

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    12S VA 868 817 (NAD83)
    Posts
    1,502
    Feedback Score
    0
    The 11-87 has never been the first choice for a tactical shotty... reliability being a big question.

    I suggest that if you really want a good 11-87, you get it in the hands of a guy that knows how to make it work... Hans is one of the best names in the business and he does work on 11-87s

    I don't have a lot of experience with them to be honest, I (like a lot of folks) played with 1100s and figured the best thing to do with an 1100 was sell it to a hunter and buy an 870... the only gas gun that I have ever been impressed with is the X2
    I put the "Amateur" in Amateur Radio...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    647
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have an 11-87 that has about a 4000 round count on it. I used it for clays for a while before I realized that I suck at shotgunning and don't have the depth perception to gauge things well in flight. I was frustrated more than anything...

    With low power loads in a 28" barrel it didn't run that reliably unless it was run really wet with lots of lube. With high power loads it worked much better. Now that it is broken in a little more it runs light loads much better, but the gas/piston system does require cleaning and new O-rings to work best and still runs into issues with lighter loads.

    I ended up with one of the short 20-21" rem-choked rifle sighted barrels that Remington makes. It worked ok with slugs, buckshot and heavy loads, but didn't work well at all on lighter loads.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    1,183
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    I have never liked the 11-87 bercause of the weight, the rough action, and the loading gate. it just doesn't feel good to me.

    I have a Browning Gold (same as X2). It is a nice, reliable, soft shooting shotgun, but it is slow and rather heavy.

    The M2 Benelli is an entirely different story, and it allowed me to finally sell off my brain-jarring pumps. The guns is light, fast and easy to shoot or carry. Cleaning is much easier than the gas guns and it has fewer parts.

    As far a light loads go, I have found a light 2 1/2" 7/8oz. load (~1100fps) that functions 100% with the 5 shot mag tube. However, it is less than 100% with the 8 shot tube. I do not know if I have a rare example or what, but it always suprises me to read reports of the Benelli's stumbling on light loads, as mine shoots this powder-puff load better than I expected. Standard loads of 1 oz. @1200 fps or heavier loads get digested without a hiccup.

    I sugest that you try to handle the Benelli M2 and the 11-87 and feel the difference in handling for yourself. Shoot one of each if you can. In my opinion the M2 is well worth the extra money.

    After all, its just money. You can always make more of it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Red Dirt, OK
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Thanks for all the replies guys. What got me started on this was I saw a guy with a Benelli M1 with a freaking 10 inch barrel on it! I guess if I actually want to use it as a "work" gun then I should stick with the 870.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    1,166
    Feedback Score
    0
    I agree on hans as well, i also say look to john at Sage he built an 11oo for me yrs ago runs like a clock.......

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Northern Virginia(
    Posts
    199
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I had a 1187 police model and after the 1st trip to the range I just had reliabilty issue's .

    Benelli's M1's are all right but the recoil method of operation gets old quick. I havent been able to play with a M2 model yet.

    Just my .02

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    186
    Feedback Score
    0

    11-87P's

    I have had experience with several 11-87P's. We had both 21" and later 18" rifle sight barrels. All of the guns worked well out of the box except one. The local repair station fixed it basically over night. The guns were 100% reliable with full power slugs & buckshot. I cannot say the same thing for reduced power loads.

    They get very dirty inside and are heavy for some users. However, they are relatively pleasant to shoot because of the gas action & their weight.

    We had a T&E sample from Scatter Gun Tech. when it was still owned by Roger Small of Nashville, TN. It had his ghost ring sights, a 14" barrel, and a SureFire 6P (I think) with a pressure switch. I thought that it was a great setup, especially for indoor use like building entry and room clearing.

    The gun was really dirty when I receieved it from another office. After a complete cleaning it would work with about five Federal tactical 00 buck of the day and them it would jamb. It was fine with full power slugs & buck.

    Remington did not begin offering a 14" 11-87 until some time later. They were concerned about the action being beaten up but the cop users told them that they didn't care, they wanted them.

    Remington redesigned the shell carrier latch release around the time they introduced the 1100 Competition Master, which was similar to the new TAC-4. They made the release longer so that it was easier for the user to hit it with their shells when loading the guns.

    FWIW:

    1. I saw a TAC 2 & 4 at a Gander Mountain. I really didn't like the feel of the pistol grip stock. It was like holding a 2"X 2" board. One of the fore ends fit poorly.
    2. I have a plain SpeedFeed youth/LE/short stock on my 18" 870. I think that the same model fits the 1100/11-87. Brownells has them.
    3. I'd love a 14" 11-87P!

    Good shopping!
    Good shooting!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •