Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: .38 snub ballistics

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0

    .38 snub ballistics

    I read the pinned post about BUG ammo selection that touches on the best rounds for use in a .38 snub, but I was wondering if anyone had the specific data on a few rounds because I can't seem to find it anywhere. I am particularly interested in the 125gr +p Golden Saber and 125gr +p PDX1. I understand the PDX1 to be a relabeled Ranger round, but then again I have also heard it is a slightly different design in some respects, but haven't heard any specifics on it. I was also wondering if the unjacketed rounds like the 158gr LSWCHP have trouble with intermediate barriers? Has anyone ever done a test to simulate what the ballistics might be if a snub is fired from inside a pants or coat pocket at a target? As far as I know the ballistics test only involve encountering clothing (i.e. denim) immediately before penetrating gel, would encountering clothing a few feet before encountering more clothing and then gel make any real difference?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    650
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I didn't check each link to see if the ammo you specified is covered, but there may be info of use to you here.

    Hope this helps...
    Last edited by lindertw; 05-10-09 at 19:17.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    The Golden Saber info used to be available directly from Remington.
    The PDX .38 ammo is very new, I don't know of anyone who has tested it yet. In fact, I haven't even seen any of that ammo outside of the announcement from Winchester.

    The 158gr LSWCHP has been around a very long time, so I'm sure the info is out there. I'm also pretty sure that firing from the pocket won't effect the terminal ballistics of the round as the dynamics of the heavy clothing tests are different than firing from the pocket.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    58
    Feedback Score
    0
    Take a closer look the the 135+P Speer Gold Dot

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    I carry the 135gr +p GD's, I was just wondering about these other two because the PDX1 is new and I hadn't heard anything, and I hadn't heard anything all together about the GS round even though it has been around a while.

    I contacted Remington and they didn't have what I was looking for, just the basic ballistics data like velocity, etc.

    Lindertw, thanks for the link, I am already a big fan of that website, but he doesn't have what I am looking for on there.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    142
    Feedback Score
    0
    As soon as I get thru this batch of 135 gold dots I think I'm switching over to the DPX stuff from Corbon.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    4
    Feedback Score
    0
    135 + P Gold Dot. Superior performance through the entire FBI testing. However if you are never going to shoot through a tough barrier, pick whatever is most comfortable to shoot to have better time on target.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    93
    Feedback Score
    0
    I am not really trying to decide on a carry round, I already have that. I am just wondering what these two rounds do because I am curious, and what unjacketed rounds do when hitting barriers because I am curious. I carry the 135gr +p Gold Dot already, just want to see the numbers on these two also.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    390
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    In the gello pics I have been able to see it seems the Speer GD 135+P and the DPX 110 +P veer considerably off their original path after they expand. They often go sideways and act like a Frisbee. It seems to me this could turn an accurate shot into a miss before the vitals are reached.

    The "old tech" 158gr HPSWC +P on the other hand seems to track straight, the Buffalo Bore 150gr Hard Cast wad cutter and the 148gr wad cutter track straight.

    Any thoughts on the consequences of this? Does it matter? It seems to me it does.
    Last edited by DBR; 05-14-09 at 21:28.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I've tested the Gold Dot and DPX several times, haven't yet seen the veering off that you mentioned.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •