Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Change of Command in A-stan: McKiernan Fired.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0

    Change of Command in A-stan: McKiernan Fired.

    This is the Time magazine take on the situation:
    .
    www.news.yahoo.com/s/time/08599189755500

    There are lots of other articles out there concerning the firing & replacement action.


    Basically Dave McKiernan ( a tanker) got fired after 11 months . He is being replaced by a two man team made up of Stanley McChrystal ( SF background ) and David Rodriguez ( former 82nd CG).
    Some sources blame Obama for the firing.
    I wonder what people here think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    VB
    Posts
    4,879
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Given the backgrounds of both McKiernan and McChrystal I'd tend to favor the move. Sounds like a step in the right direction to me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    The Meadows
    Posts
    171
    Feedback Score
    0
    It takes an SF man to command SF men.
    I treat everyone with respect. I stack them in my trunk neatly.

    Keeping the "oath" since 1980.

    Okay. Now we do it my way.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0

    Thumbs up

    Seems that way to me , too.

    There's a new US Ambasssdor in Kabul as well.
    Karl Eikenberry has 2 military tours in country , but this is his first time in a State Dept job there (AFAIK , anyway).

    www.wikipedia.com

    Type in: Karl Eikenberry.

    The New York Times described the choice of a career Army guy for the job as "highly unusual".

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0

    Question

    .
    Anyone else?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Durham, NC
    Posts
    171
    Feedback Score
    0
    It seems like a good move by Obama to me. They apparently want to get on offense in Afghanistan (and maybe Pakistan too) and the SF general is more likely to be effective in that role. His background seems more suited to the rapid deployment of troops into hot spots and then chasing the enemy instead of occupying turf. Hopefully, it works out well and we can finally get Bin Laden's crew and/or get the Taliban back on their heels.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,388
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Anyone find the timing odd; I mean with the shooting incident in Iraq?


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0
    I think that this has been brewing for a while.

    Among other factors-- the SecDef is a carry-over , not a noob appointment.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,795
    Feedback Score
    0
    FWIW, they should have appointed an unconventional commander from the beginning. The war probably would be winding down by now. The ability to think outside the box is still an alien concept to the Big Army. Conventional commanders fail every time in the UW arena.
    For God and the soldier we adore, In time of danger, not before! The danger passed, and all things righted, God is forgotten and the soldier slighted." - Rudyard Kipling

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,019
    Feedback Score
    0
    Belated update.
    McKiernan retired on 15 July , at Ft Myer , Va.

    http://www.defenselink.mil/news/news....aspx?id=55135

    At first I thought the photo had to have been switched by accident. Quite a change in a short time.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •