Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Shoot close to cover or away from it?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    SATX
    Posts
    1,187
    Feedback Score
    0

    Shoot close to cover or away from it?

    I have been taught both ways; get close and use cover for support and I have been admonished not to "suck" up to cover.

    Any reasoned opinions?

    Thanks
    Last edited by Redhat; 05-14-09 at 20:10.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    574
    Feedback Score
    0
    I was taught situation dictates, but generally don't get right behind the cover. It's always good to have some standoff, because it's still there regardless how close you get to it. Plus it's a better chance of you getting some debris or shrapnel when you are right up on it. Just my opinion though...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    201
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    deleted
    Last edited by Tom_Jones; 12-01-11 at 11:55.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    SATX
    Posts
    1,187
    Feedback Score
    0
    Tom Jones,

    Exactly! I read that article a while back, however: I noticed in Green Eyes and Black Rifles that they get right up on it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    47
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    You pay your money and you take your chances.

    Generally, I think you shouldn't crowd the cover for the ricochet and debris mentioned earlier. Conversely, if you can rest your weapon or get a better shooting platform & position by tying into the cover then you are making a compromise in safety in order to get a higher probability shot(s).

    A large consideration is the scenario based upon how many zombies you may be fighting. That is, a LEO on perimeter for a single barricaded gunman has a different set of circumstances and chances of exchanging gunfire than an Infantryman in an urban fight against squads or platoons of mooselimbs. While both are dangerous, the LEO can likely accept more risk in crowding cover for a better shot while the Infantryman probably needs to stay back in order to maximize cover due to the multiple threats and angles of fire.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Iron-sapper View Post
    A large consideration is the scenario based upon how many zombies you may be fighting.
    HAHA

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    in other words: train for both, and make it situational.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,766
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    The reality of crowding cover was shown quite well to me once at Blackwater. We had several concrete blocks set up on the far side of the hood of a car. We took turns skipping rounds off the hood breaking the blocks. Ever since then, I've always made a habit of staying away from the vehicle whenever possible.

    I wonder if some of the greater emphasis we currently see on bracing on cover is bleed-over from 3 Gun.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    SATX
    Posts
    1,187
    Feedback Score
    0
    NC,

    I doubt it,

    Basic military firing positons /doctrine have been to always use support if available.

    Another reason given to me aside from ricochet, is that if you crowd, you also give up some SA. Many folks "feel" more protected when in tight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    574
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redhat View Post
    Many folks "feel" more protected when in tight.
    That and how some people mistake concealment for cover.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •