Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: DOJ decision will allow illegals to vote in Georgia elections

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,312
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    DOJ decision will allow illegals to vote in Georgia elections

    The Obama Administration's Dept of Justice this week rejected a Georgia law that requires "citizenship checks" for voter registration (social security numbers and drivers' license data). The DOJ argues that the law places an undue burden on various minorities, which has a "discriminatory effect" on their voting rights. However, the Georgia Secretary of State argues that the legal effect of this decision is that it would even allow non-citizens (read: illegals) to vote in Georgia state elections. And yes, it is the illegal aliens "movement" that is behind all this: the name of the group that filed suit leading to the DOJ decision is the "Southeastern Regional Counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund."

    It seems pretty clear what the Obama DOJ is up to here: softening the voter registration rules for groups such as ACORN, to clear the way for more illegal voters. They are already changing the demographics of the voting population in this country, and movements like this will clearly support that trend. We had better hope that Georgia and other states are successful in fighting off this attempt by the federal government to tinker with their elections for political reasons. If they aren't, the integrity of our elections is going to be seriously compromised in the near future. It already has been, IMHO, but moves like this one by the DOJ will really "open the floodgates" to illegal voters, as the Georgia Sec. of State said.


    http://www.kdvr.com/news/nationworld...,3319764.story

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    The article/interpretation is flawed. The Voting Rights Act (which is what the DOJ/Article refers to as the basis of the decision) only applies to citizens.

    The DOJ is saying that the methods Georgia is using to determine citizenship will impede legal citizens from voting. It is NOT saying that Georgia (or any other state) should allow illegals to vote. Georgia can certainly come up with another way of determining citizenship eligibility, but my guess is that this will be challenged in the Courts by Georgia Sec. of State.

    Any attempt to allow illegals to vote in the United States would be a violation of Constitutional Guarantees of a Republican form of government.
    Last edited by Gutshot John; 06-02-09 at 09:45.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    The Greatest Planet in the Universe
    Posts
    3,388
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post
    The article/interpretation is flawed. The Voting Rights Act (which is what the DOJ/Article refers to as the basis of the decision) only applies to citizens.

    The DOJ is saying that the methods Georgia is using to determine citizenship will impede legal citizens from voting. It is NOT saying that Georgia (or any other state) should allow illegals to vote. Georgia can certainly come up with another way of determining citizenship eligibility, but my guess is that this will be challenged in the Courts by Georgia Sec. of State.

    Any attempt to allow illegals to vote in the United States would be a violation of Constitutional Guarantees of a Republican form of government.
    Agreed, but (pun intended) name one legislator outside of Ron Paul respects our Constitutional Guarantees of a Republican form of government.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,714
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post

    Any attempt to allow illegals to vote in the United States would be a violation of Constitutional Guarantees of a Republican form of government.
    so what makes you think this group pays any mind to the Constitution?
    never push a wrench...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ra2bach View Post
    so what makes you think this group pays any mind to the Constitution?
    You missed the point. The guarantees of Republican Government provide a means by which the state can challenge the DOJ decision in the Courts.

    Among other reasons... without the Constitution they have no power at all.
    Last edited by Gutshot John; 06-02-09 at 11:33.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    1,890
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post
    Among other reasons... without the Constitution they have no power at all.
    Mao might disagree with you.

    Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.
    Constitution? We don't need no stinkin' constitution...
    "The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts." Justice Robert Jackson, WV St. Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)

    "I don’t care how many pull ups and sit ups you can do. I care that you can move yourself across the ground with a fighting load and engage the enemy." Max Velocity

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •