Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ballistic gelatin

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0

    Ballistic gelatin

    When did Ballistic gelatin come into use?


    TNX

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0
    Interesting, but I was looking for the year ballistic gelatin was first used.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Gel was experimented with during the 1930's, in widespread use through the 1950's, and by around 1960 20% gel testing was a standardized USG methodology.
    Last edited by DocGKR; 06-14-09 at 21:25.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thank you.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    Eventually, I suspect it will all be done with accurate computer modeling, however, computer simulations still have a way to go.

  6. #6
    ToddG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Eventually, I suspect it will all be done with accurate computer modeling, however, computer simulations still have a way to go.
    You mean I can't just cube the muzzle energy and get an accurate representation of wound profile? Dammit ...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    3,347
    Feedback Score
    0
    "You mean I can't just cube the muzzle energy and get an accurate representation of wound profile?"
    Nah...you have to take the inverse square root of the integral derivative of the cross sectional area of the fully expanded projectile, less the mass function of the tissue displaced by the temporary stretch--divide that by the impact kinetic energy velocity function and you should be close to what the current Operational Requirement-based Casualty Assessment Weighted Task Average Impairment metric currently provides...

  8. #8
    ToddG Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Nah...you have to take the inverse square root of the integral derivative of the cross sectional area of the fully expanded projectile, less the mass function of the tissue displaced by the temporary stretch--divide that by the impact kinetic energy velocity function and you should be close to what the current Operational Requirement-based Casualty Assessment Weighted Task Average Impairment metric currently provides...
    I think I'll just stick to "pick something on DocGKR's list." But thanks.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    521
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DocGKR View Post
    Nah...you have to take the inverse square root of the integral derivative of the cross sectional area of the fully expanded projectile, less the mass function of the tissue displaced by the temporary stretch--divide that by the impact kinetic energy velocity function and you should be close to what the current Operational Requirement-based Casualty Assessment Weighted Task Average Impairment metric currently provides...
    References... must have references!!!

    Wait... I thought you had to start with the inverse CUBE root... and that the end result would in fact NOT be very close to what the current Operational Requirement-based Casualty Assessment Weighted Task Average Impairment metric currently provides.
    I am sure that it is closer to the Casualty Requirement Assessment Requirement, better known as C.R.A.P.
    Last edited by Glock17JHP; 06-18-09 at 13:48.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •