Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: I'm thinking about a 6.8 upper. Should I be?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    150
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    I should be picking up my first 6.8 upper in the next month or so. What led me to the 6.8 was...
    1) Better ballistics. I've been on hog hunts with the 5.56 that didn't turn out so great, and I want to be able to hunt deer which in Florida is prohibited with .22 caliber rounds.
    2) Better projectile selection. Some could argue that given #1 above I should just use my AK. Maybe, but the AK is pretty limited in terms of factory ammo while the 6.8 has a very broad range of loads.
    3) Efficiency. The better ballistics and projectile options mean that a 6.8 can perform as well as, or better than, a 5.56 with a shorter barrel. I'm opting for a 12.5" barrel which should equal the performance of a 16-18" barrel 5.56.
    4) Precision. At the same time as I was looking for a more lethal option for hunting I was also looking for a precision option for static position shooting. I was shopping 18" 5.56 uppers, but given #3 above...
    5) Economy. Yes, I said economy. When I started looking for #4 I also started shopping ammo for same. What I found was that better quality 5.56 loads cost pretty much the same as the 6.8 loads I was shopping. I also figured that one upper, which I would be buying anyway in 5.56, that would do the same duty as the hunting rifle I was going to buy anyway, would make for a less expensive solution to my two problems.
    This would be effective in a comparison of 5.56 to 6.8, but I was comparing it with 7.62x39 in my AK platform. It narrows the differences a bit more. I do sub-200 yard shooting, so the flatter-shooting 6.8 wouldn't matter. For precision, the 7.62x39 itself is actually pretty decent, but in my AK platform, not so great. And economy would be more difficult to weigh in the 6.8 over the 7.62x39.

    After it's all said and done though, for an SBR, I think I'm going 6.8 lol

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sonoran Desert-Arizona
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0
    With a year plus beyond the last post... How have the 6.8 prospects turned out? Also interested in follow up to the earlier question about Bison's 6.8 offerings?

    I am thinking about an upper in 6.8 as well.
    Last edited by DHart; 10-31-10 at 22:43.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    34
    Feedback Score
    0
    I had built 14.5 6.8 and 7.62x39 AR's using the PWS Mark 1 piston designs (similar to the diablo's). Using Surefire MB's the recoil is pretty light and I love both of mine. The 6.8 is reserved for Defense, I shoot the crap out of the 7.62x39 though. Shooting 50 and 100 only I don't see any difference outside the 6.8 ammo is simply better quality.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sonoran Desert-Arizona
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by superman07 View Post
    I had built 14.5 6.8 and 7.62x39 AR's using the PWS Mark 1 piston designs (similar to the diablo's). Using Surefire MB's the recoil is pretty light and I love both of mine. The 6.8 is reserved for Defense, I shoot the crap out of the 7.62x39 though. Shooting 50 and 100 only I don't see any difference outside the 6.8 ammo is simply better quality.
    Superman07, I have similar intentions, 6.8 reserved for defense and shooting the crap out of my 5.56/.223. I am planning to go with a BattleComp BABC comp.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,105
    Feedback Score
    0
    It's an intermediate caliber (depending on how you define). If you want that, you should also consider the new 300 blackout.
    "Men speak of natural rights, but I challenge any one to show where in nature any rights existed or were recognized until there was established for their declaration and protection a duly promulgated body of corresponding laws." --Calvin Coolidge

  6. #26
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sonoran Desert-Arizona
    Posts
    713
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by carbinero View Post
    It's an intermediate caliber (depending on how you define). If you want that, you should also consider the new 300 blackout.
    Yeah, intermediate is fine for me... it's just a defense gun not much for hunting.

    Wouldn't 300 blackout be much more obscure? As if 6.8 isn't obscure enough?

    I must add that I know very little about rifle calibers...

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    7488 ft.
    Posts
    2,458
    Feedback Score
    18 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    That's true. I forget that people want to hunt with the round. I tend to get locked into the notion of a long range fighting gun.
    Yeah, for me the 6.8 is a decent mid range deer caliber which allows use of the AR15 platform. For long range, the 7.62 is much more suitable, as the 6.8 gets a bit weak beyond 300 yds.

    Maybe the 6.8 is what .mil should use. And maybe the Garand should have been chambered in .276 Pedersen. The reality is that a Garand in .276 Pedersen would be nearly impossible to find ammo for, and the 5.56 outshines the 6.8 by 100,000 to 1 (or more) in terms of being able to get your hands on some ammo in a pinch.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,022
    Feedback Score
    0
    under 300 yards I take my 6.8
    if expecting shots past that my 308

    have not had a single deer or hog walk away from a 6.8 hit
    Charles Coker

    Disclosure statement:
    Pro Staff - Silencer Shop
    Dealer - Armasight and Steiner Optics
    Affiliated with Trijicon, Wilson Combat and Crux Suppressors

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •