my preference and what most guys are using is the night force 1.375 rings.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
my preference and what most guys are using is the night force 1.375 rings.
The 32mm is going on 2 of my Knights platforms. The SR-15 match (civvie MK12) and my USMC issue MK11.
Apologies for the necropost, but wondering if anyone knowledgeable wanted to chime in on this particular offering and whether it is suitable.
http://www.eurooptic.com/nightforce-...-dot-c453.aspx
Also, any objections to Badger Ordnance rings?
Doing my part to keep malls safe
any new thoughts on this ?
And perhaps a suggestion on where to buy?
this one is gonna hurt the wallet, hard.
http://www.eurooptic.com/nightforce-...-dot-c453.aspx
Last edited by 30 cal slut; 05-28-13 at 11:46.
Doing my part to keep malls safe
Some affordable options have opened up (Like the Vortex 2.5-10x44) which can work for budget options, and that's made the Leupold MR/T option even less attractive, but that NF you mention is still the premiere Mk12 type optic.
عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
Semper Fi
"Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister
I'm a noob, so take this with a grain of salt, but I vote for the NF 2.5-10x32.
The x24 may work just as well, but they are harder to find as they are no longer offered on the civilian market.
I have a NF 2.5-10x32 with Illuminated Mil-Dot. I find the eyebox fairly easy to get behind, but I can only compare that to a cheaper Leupold hunting scope and a Nikon 223.
I have never looked through a S&B, Kahles, USO or Premier so saying the glass is great, I have nothing to back that up, but I do find the glass to be very good. I have not noticed any chromatic aberration at 10x, no tunneling at 2.5x.
I find it to be a really good scope.
Mine sits in a LaRue SPR-E mount. I once placed the rifle against a wall to take a quick photo of it. It fell over impacting the floor with the scope objective. I nearly pooped my pants. Took it to the range a week later and was very happy to see there was no shift in zero and no change to the tracking ability of the scope. Additionally, speaking of the mound, it has been taken off the rifle several times with no zero shift.
The NF is a tank to be sure.
My only wish is that I had Mil adjustments as opposed to MOA, but I bought the scope used and it was an awesome deal.
Last edited by Alex V; 05-28-13 at 13:48.
..It was you to me who taught
In Jersey anythings' legal, as long as you don't get caught.
I am also looking for an optic for my Noveske 18” SPR. I had a NF 2.5-10x 32 R2 recital, Zero Stop, in a LaRue SPR Mount. I got rid of it. It was my second NF 2.5-10x 32 and I am not a fan. I have also had a NF 1X4 and got rid of that also. I do not think that they are bad scopes, just not for me. Now I am leaning back to a Leuplod MK IV (TMR), not sure what power yet, maybe the 4X16.
In no way do I make any money from anyone related to the firearms industry.
"I have never heard anyone say after a firefight that I wish that I had not taken so much ammo.", ME
"Texas can make it without the United States, but the United States can't make it without Texas !", General Sam Houston
another option
http://www.laruetactical.com/nightfo...lt104-qd-mount
but it's moa/moa i think.
Doing my part to keep malls safe
Bookmarks