|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I actually dont know who the manufacturer is, I ordered it from BCM off their site.
Another thing, why ditch the spikes buffer? No good?
i ran a spikes t2 in mine, ran fine
I pick up my dedicated upper tomorrow. 11" Colt barrel and AAC Ranger 2 under a PRI tube. I'm going to use an A5 buffer. The standard one probably isn't heavy enough, we will see.
It is my impression the BOLT CAN be used in any set up and function properly. I see no technical reason for it not to. If there is one I would be interested to hear it. I can see how the CARRIER could be trouble some for use outside of its original design purpose because of it venting more gas and having modified timing of the cam pin slot. Here is a quote from another thread that seems to have some more accurate info on the LMT enhanced Bolt, carrier and BCG as a whole.
Tag for later
From talking with LMT, this isn't the case.
The enhanced carrier slow down the un-lock speed and blows the extra gas out. This is VERY much needed in a suppressed weapon.
I also have tons of expereince with making the enhanced carrier work AND seeing the enhanced bolt and enhanced BCG FAIL to form a pretty good opinion on the subject.
C4
I surely understand the reason the carrier works in a suppressed weapon. That makes sense to me. I don't doubt that.
What I don't understand is why the enhanced bolt would not work. It is, from a technical stand point, a Superior bolt. What is the technical reason for it to hinder function in a weapon, and in what way does it hinder the function of the weapon?
And since you do have so much experience I am interested in what problems the bolt caused that a standard one does not.
Bookmarks