Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: How Long Will a Forged AR Lower Last?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Posts
    2,043
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    So I can finally stop buying lowers and start buying barrels/uppers?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    848
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have never understood why people go gonzo over billet recievers, vs a quality forged unit.

    It has been my experience with mountain biking that forged parts are always stronger than thier billet counterpart. While at the same time providing safe and predictable failure carachteristics should the part be stressed outside of it's design requirements. As the grain structure of a forged aluminum part follows the contours of the part. Where as a billet part is like carving something out of a solid block of wood, you deall with grain structures that may be out of line with the forces involved, and cracks tend to propogate along the grain.

    In my opinion, if you are building a rifle for usage,vs a safe queen then forged recievers are typically the better, stronger alternative. That said, a lower reciever takes nowhere near the beating that a set of mountain bike cranks take. So in reality the strength difference between a billet vs forged reciever may never make come into play in the realworld, unless you have to slam the buttstock against an object on a regular basis.
    Last edited by An Undocumented Worker; 07-09-09 at 08:45.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    516
    Feedback Score
    0
    i have a DPMS lower with over 30,000 rds. thru it no . this past fall i attended the
    bw arm. course and found that my trigger pin had cracked in half, during the course i rebuilt the lower and since put a few thousand rounds thru it. i would change out the action spring every 7-10,000 rds..

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,217
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by An Undocumented Worker View Post
    I have never understood why people go gonzo over billet recievers, vs a quality forged unit.

    It has been my experience with mountain biking that forged parts are always stronger than thier billet counterpart. While at the same time providing safe and predictable failure carachteristics should the part be stressed outside of it's design requirements. As the grain structure of a forged aluminum part follows the contours of the part. Where as a billet part is like carving something out of a solid block of wood, you deall with grain structures that may be out of line with the forces involved, and cracks tend to propogate along the grain.

    In my opinion, if you are building a rifle for usage,vs a safe queen then forged recievers are typically the better, stronger alternative. That said, a lower reciever takes nowhere near the beating that a set of mountain bike cranks take. So in reality the strength difference between a billet vs forged reciever may never make come into play in the realworld, unless you have to slam the buttstock against an object on a regular basis.
    I completely agree. I'd never us a billet lower. Most shooters on this sight know the difference. If you go over to ARF, you'll get some goofballs that would argue these facts with you. They don't realize that they paid more money for a weaker part!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    PHOENIX AZ
    Posts
    422
    Feedback Score
    0
    SECOND COMMING ?,I'm still waiting for the first .
    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    billets generally have thicker material, but they're also generally 6061 aluminum, which is softer.

    forged 7075t6 lowers are tougher, but not as thick.

    7075t6 billet, on the other hand, is the best of both worlds...

    i think any 7075t6 lower will probably last through the Second Coming, though. it's the lowest wear part on your gun.
    WHO ME ? ---- A government big enough to
    give you everything you want, is
    strong enough to take everything
    you have.
    -- Thomas Jefferson

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Republic of Texas
    Posts
    854
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bkb0000 View Post
    billets generally have thicker material, but they're also generally 6061 aluminum, which is softer.

    forged 7075t6 lowers are tougher, but not as thick.

    7075t6 billet, on the other hand, is the best of both worlds...

    i think any 7075t6 lower will probably last through the Second Coming, though. it's the lowest wear part on your gun.
    Who makes the 7075t6 lowers?
    Member of the JPFO, NRA, and TSRA!

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    2,770
    Feedback Score
    0
    This is taken from stiller web site:
    Our new Predator XT Billet AR lowers will be the state of the art foundation for your new gas gun project. We researched far and wide to determine what exactly the perfect AR lower should be, and this is what we came up with. First we determined that we had to go billet. That was going to be the only way we could offer the features we wanted to include. After a painstaking study, we found that the best combination of stiffness, strength and toughness was offered by high performance aircraft alloy that is used in military fighter jet structures. We found a California metals distributor to supply us with it. It is 7050-T7651. It is almost twice as strong as 6061-T6 and has better crack toughness then 7075. It was the best thing we could find, so that is what we used.

    In reference to Stillers new billet lower By the way Stiller makes aluminum bench rest actions and is well respected in the bench rest community.

    http://www.viperactions.com/

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Kennett Square Pa
    Posts
    2,826
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Can anybody actually answer this question? To many variable to answer the OP's question.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    62
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markm View Post
    I completely agree. I'd never us a billet lower. Most shooters on this sight know the difference. If you go over to ARF, you'll get some goofballs that would argue these facts with you. They don't realize that they paid more money for a weaker part!
    I don't think I would go as far to say I would never use a billet lower, but I sure would not pay the premium for one. Some of the billet uppers on the market are pretty nice though. The Vltor MUR and Larue come to mind. I wouldn't mind using either one of those. Currently everything I have is forged.

    I've seen some of the reasoning behind billet as being more dimentionally accurate than forgings. Not sure what kind of truth there is to this.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by CTBuilder1 View Post
    I don't think I would go as far to say I would never use a billet lower, but I sure would not pay the premium for one. Some of the billet uppers on the market are pretty nice though. The Vltor MUR and Larue come to mind. I wouldn't mind using either one of those. Currently everything I have is forged.

    I've seen some of the reasoning behind billet as being more dimentionally accurate than forgings. Not sure what kind of truth there is to this.
    those are uppers, though.. we be talkin lowers, dawg.

    i cant think of any billet lowers i've had, but i've done a few uppers. they serve a purpose.. billet lowers serve no purpose but looks. and, as we all know, doing anything to your gun for style points is gay, right?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •