Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 81

Thread: Reliability Improvements M16 - M4A1

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,144
    Feedback Score
    0

    Reliability Improvements M16 - M4A1

    List the reliability improvements that have been implemented starting with the military fielding the M16 through the M4A1. (Not civilian AR's)

    For organization list the improvements that only pertain to reliability in the cycle of operation and those that addressed known issues and increased service life. Not furniture, sights, etc.

    For example chrome lining barrels, what corrective actions were taken to address bolt failures, extraction issues, etc.

    Hopefully we can put it in chronological order later.
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Buffer weight was changed to slow the cyclic rate due to a switch from IMR powder to ball powder....I think.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Copper extractor spring and black insert.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    The forward assist was added, but that will probably incur some denial as to it's addition to reliability.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    581
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    magazines, springs, and followers went through multiple iterations.

    standard 5.56 round went through a few revisions as well. I suspect a gunpowder changed quite a bit to improve performance/reliability.

    thicker barrel on M4A1 (socom) probably didn't improve reliability as much as stability under high rate of fire.
    Last edited by alx01; 02-03-22 at 00:48.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,286
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by alx01 View Post
    magazines, springs, and followers went through multiple iterations.

    standard 5.56 round went through a few revisions as well. I suspect a gunpowder changed quite a bit to improve performance/reliability.

    thicker barrel on M4A1 (socom) probably didn't improve reliability as much as stability under high rate of fire.
    The early gun powder change actually made the rifle less reliable by jacking up the cyclic rate from about 750 rpm to something like 950 rpm. If I remember correctly, this powder fouled more.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,144
    Feedback Score
    0
    Within the parameters of reliability in the cycle of operation it doesn't appear there was much to improve upon the original Stoner design with the gun itself.
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,312
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Midlength gas system on the URGI.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Former USA
    Posts
    3,144
    Feedback Score
    0
    Wasn't there a problem with bolts breaking after the GWOT kicked off?

    Seems like that was do to a manufacturing process that didn't require any design modifications...
    You won't outvote the corruption.
    Sic Semper Tyrannis

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    452
    Feedback Score
    0
    Chrome lining of bore/chamber, fencing on lower receiver, forward assist, thickened barrel profile (A2, M4, SOCOM), extractor insert, O ring and gold extractor spring, M4 feed ramps, various buffer weight corresponding to barrel length and gas port size.

Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •