In the last couple of weeks, I have been noticing a lot of "BCM" threads. Most of them are on TOS, but there has been some on here as well.
These threads tend to be about someone having an "issue."
Example A: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.htm...f=118&t=451476
If you read the title of the thread, the OP is asking if people would "accept" this BCG. He then added, that he has been in touch with the manufacturer.
The OP then advises the "hive" that he is not going to name the company until they have "made it right."
Once the OP gets what he wants, he announces who the company was. Then everyone dog piles on that Paul's QC is slipping.
My question is, what if the "hive" said that it is fine and just shoot it? What would the OP do then? Keep it? People are pretending to ask questions about whether or not they should keep something, but in reality are basically lying as they have already DEMANDED that the manufacturer refund their shipping and get them a new one out.
Example B: http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.htm...=451618&page=2
In this thread, Paul is not even aware of it and people start to ASSume that he is hiding from the issue because he has not responded.
Paul provides a detailed response based on what the TDP allows and everyone just melts away. No further discussion by the "herd."
So here is my question. What do people believe that they are gaining by doing these types of threads? Do they believe that the manufacturer will be interested in helping them faster? Do they believe that they will endear themselves to the dealer? Do they think that they are doing the "community" a service with these threads? If so, what service did they accomplish?
In the first thread, the marks on top of the carrier can barely be seen by the naked eye and has zero to do with the functionality of the BCG. In the second thread, the BCG's are 100% in spec with the TDP and so there is nothing wrong with them in the least.
What people (that know next to nothing about AR's) will get from threads like the above two is that Paul is doing poor QC, and that there are "flaws" in their BCG.
In actuality, what people SHOULD take from the thread is that Paul does NOT personally inspect each BCG that leaves the shop (has employees for that) and they can make mistakes. That the BCG's are 100% in spec with the US Govt issued TDP and are as good as it gets.
I apologize up front for the rant, but have had a rash of customers doing, saying and threatening us with REALLY stupid BS and if we do not do it their way, they will "trash us" on the net.Couple this with the recent "BCM sucks threads" and I am just about over it.
C4


Couple this with the recent "BCM sucks threads" and I am just about over it.
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks