
Originally Posted by
rmecapn
Practical advice?!?! The responses made him think if he didn't purchase a Colt, LMT, or G&R LPK then his lower would be caca! I've been around this site since when it actually belonged to G&R Tactical and the one thing I've never seen is emprical data to support that a CMT or RRA LPK has a higher failure rate of parts than does Colt or LMT. If it exists, it would be great to see it. Maybe Pat Rogers has a log of such things. While the manufacturing criteria for the Colt, LMT, and G&R kits may be stricter, that doesn't constitute real world examples of failure rates in actual use. That is practical information that an individual needs when making an informed decision.
He asked for an opinion, I gave it. I didn't say that if you didn't get Grant's kit full of LMT, Colt, Magpul etc products that his rifle would work. It was a simple suggestion, I said nothing about it had to be this certain company.
"My craving is, and always has been, to be involved in actions conducted to ensure America remains strong, safe, and free of those who have its destruction as their goal."
- Billy Waugh
"When you enter a room full of armed men, shoot the first person who moves, hostile or otherwise. He has started to think and is therefore dangerous."
- Robert "Paddy" Mayne
Bookmarks