I can't speak for the military now, but when I was in during the late 90s (US Army), it was very advantageous to be lean. The Army standard of testing muscular endurance vs. muscular strength is in line with Army demands on the body.
I was the muscular guy (back then) that never could max the 2 mile run. I always maxed my push-ups and sit-ups, but I never maxed my 2 mile run during a record APFT (when it mattered). Once I came within 30 seconds but I was wearing a flack jacket on that run (Bosnia).
I'm not saying that strength isn't important in the military, just that endurance is more important. Here's the scenario: 18-25 mile forced road march followed by digging foxholes all night with a glorified foldable table spoon, followed by tactical engagements the entire following day, ambush patrol all the next night, etc, etc, etc... places a higher premium on endurance over strength.
I was always on the overweight list (I was 5'11" and weighed 190 lbs), but that was always cleared up when they did the tape test (which I have problems with as well, but that will be for another time and place).
Bookmarks