While I want to like the XPS, I'm soon to be removing my 552/F from my primary duty rifle and replacing it with a Micro H1, for most of the reasons Alaskapopo writes about.
Also, the Micro is about 1/2 the weight of the XPS.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
While I want to like the XPS, I'm soon to be removing my 552/F from my primary duty rifle and replacing it with a Micro H1, for most of the reasons Alaskapopo writes about.
Also, the Micro is about 1/2 the weight of the XPS.
They are great little sights. So far it has held up great and it feels much more durable than my 511's and 512's.
For those of you running these what mount are you using since it is shorter?
Just so you know, in some radical asymmetric shooting position, the small tube of the T1/H1 is not a good idea. I like the bigger tube in the M2/3 if you have to have a Aimpoint. Of course the bigger window of the EOTech is even better
I ran mine during a EAG Carbine Operators Course this past weekend without issue. Also there was a Marine in the class who had one and it also ran without issue.
Last edited by GLOCKMASTER; 10-16-09 at 20:21.
Larue sounds good just wondering if something was out to fit it in length.
You can't beat a Larue mount. If you can, I would love to know about it...
I find the ADM stuff equally as well made......
Yes, maybe you did not have a problem, I just find with me, I have to work harder to get the T1 in line. however, the small foot print of the sight does make it a very attractive package, but I don't think Aimpoint ever made the T1 as a primary sight, it was mean to be a supplemental sight to a magnified optic.
I purchased two T1s when it was released, I sold one with the ADM mount and kept the the other for my Benelli S90. As for Aimpoint, i am still a huge fan of the M2/3.
Last edited by SMGLee; 10-17-09 at 03:59.
Bookmarks