Right, but here’s the thing. Either we advocate for the inclusion of all relevant personal defense liberty securing related mediums, widgets, tech et al or we the public relegate ourselves to being satisfied with the base level of “armaments”.
Obviously no one here on M4C that the 2A only applies to black powder muskets with respect to small arms and unfortunately we have a hard enough time convincing individuals of the utility of FA, Suppressors, DDs, etc let alone the equivalency of NV, thermal, Armor, or lasers, the latter of which is heavily regulated as we all know. Separate regulatory frameworks of course exist to curtail public ownership and usage that have forever been excluded from civil liberty discussions because let’s be real the FDA doesn’t give a damn about our rights, and never will unless forced to. I love to kick TNVC in the balls and if you follow on over at TOS they even publicly stated they haven’t done much of anything to try and influence industry opinion and that the market should just be happy they brought civ powered MAWLs out for consumption because “use what they use”
Point is comms shouldn’t be treated any differently and should be included in the conversation like anything else.
The government as an entity hates the BoR because it constrains enforcement and regulatory action. Let’s be real if the FCC hates HAM and civilian radio usage because if they had their way they’d sell out the ENTIRE spectrum to the telecom super conglomerates and tell the public to pound sand, conglomerates of which by the way include the likes of Motorola so they can absolutely go stick a rusty fork in their eye and die from tetanus.
In the end comms and and comm gear should be treated the same as small arms and promoted as equally important.
#minisoapboxmoment
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bookmarks