|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wow you assume all that from what the reply you posted above, rather broad assumption IMO(and yes I know you don't care about my opinion). So here is what I know as I can & will only speak for myself, I will never be concerned with CS when dealing with Ruger.
My one and only experience with Ruger's non warrenty was handled quick and to my satisfaction. One issue out of a minimum of 25 Ruger products over the years and how they handled it pretty much allows me to own their products with out worry. Let me guess Grant, your not a Ruger dealer.
Married to my hero life saver best friend wife & proud father of 2.
BSmith "But, some of the shit falls under the "just because you can..."Iraqgunz "Enough of your nonsense. Please check yourself post haste."markm "If you like the side charger and see the lack of dust cover as a plus, you should double down on bad ideas and get a piston as well. A case of Independece Ammo will be the icing on the cake."
If a company will not answer a simple question, then one HAS to always assume the worst. Stating some lawyer BS that really tells you NOTHING about what they will and will not do, does not sit well with me.
I have owned and own several Ruger products. I am also a stocking dealer (sorry to burst your bubble). The difference between you and I is that I do not drink their kool aid and recognize BS when I see it.
C4
Last edited by C4IGrant; 09-29-09 at 16:42.
seems to me to be cookie cut answers to questions about nfa items. i would image you would get a similar response if you asked about putting the upper on an m16 lower or whether it will work with rdias?
for what it's worth, ruger is a publicly traded company, as a rule they tend to be a lot more cautious.
They have the same warranty policy as company that is high on "the chart".
Due to the many different requirements imposed by federal and state laws on consumer warranties, no express warranty , either "full" or "limited" is offered with this product. Implied warranties, including the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, are limited in duration to one year from the date of purchase. We will not cover normal wear and tear or abuse. Some states do not allow limitations on how long an implied warranty lasts, so this limitation may not apply to you.
Last edited by C4IGrant; 09-30-09 at 10:53.
The more and more I read about this gun the more I begin to realize that it seems like more of a novelty product then anything. A $2,000 dollar novelty product, but still.
Here's my take on the issue:
Will the SR-556 fail because of a can. Doubtful.
Grant, I own a SR-556, and I'm 99.9% my warranty is voided by buying stuff from you and putting it on there.
IIRC, modifying anything on the firearm is an instant warranty-buster. Thusly, by installing the G&R selector switch, MOE Grip, and Enhanced Trigger Guard negated my warranty. I would bet that if you called them, and asked about installing a Geiselle trigger, they would say that it should NOT be installed.
Here's the problem I see with the Ruger. Tons of AR newbies are going to get one. They are going to eventually put cans on them, and then experience increased component wear due to the installation thereof. Then, they will send the rifle in to Ruger for repair, and Ruger will tell 'em to fly a kite, since they've used aftermarket add-ons with the weapon. Then, said customer trips, because Ruger won't honour their "awesome" warranty. Then Ruger loses a customer forever, and he gets on a forum, and tells everyone what a piece of shit the SR-556 is, and how Ruger won't even honour the warranty. This then cuts into sales.
Maybe I'm getting too hypothetical, but I believe Ruger is simply covering its own ass, in a cheesy, hokey, political fashion.
P.S. If the treats I got from you, and dropped in the SR-556 haven't voided my warranty, I guarantee Seth's buffer sure as shit will.
ETA: As far as the "gimmick/novelty" argument for Ruger's choice of operating system on the SR-556, stop and step back.
...wait...
Ruger has absolutely ZERO experience with a DI weapon-system. If they'd have come out with a DI system, I would have steered so clear of it, it wouldn't have been funny. I can only assume Ruger chose the II system due to that being the only system they have any experience with whatsoever.
If I'm coming across as a Kool-Aide sipper, I'm not. Hit the search button, and I hated this thing the instant it came out. The only Ruger product I was ever enamoured by, prior to the SR-556, was a .45LC Vaquero. I've never had a bad experience with a Ruger product, but I was wholly underwhelmed with the majority of the ones that I have owned or used.
Last edited by Outlander Systems; 09-30-09 at 12:45.
Bookmarks