
Originally Posted by
UrbanRunner
I remember many years ago a great class by a retired PA State Trooper on why we should wear seat belts. First he went through the moment by moment crash analysis of a trooper who had died in a crash. The lethal blow had come well down the sequence of events and would never have happened had he been wearing his seat-belt. He followed this with a discussion about how your decision effects not just you but many others and recounted making death notification visits to parents following crashes where their unseat belted child had died and its long term effect on the surviving family.
So with the H1N1 vaccine a persons decision not to protect themselves can have long term impacts on others besides themselves. But you know, sometimes life is like that. If someone decides to roll the dice, take the risk and not be immunized I don't think they should be forced to do so. Even though their decision effects others beyond themselves. It just frees up that vaccine for another person.
However, if someone is offered the H1N1 vaccine and refuses it for no exceptional reason (such as could not afford it, missed the immunization time due to work, etc). I mean, if for no other reason than due to their own conduct they did not get immunized. Then I think they just pulled the Darwin switch and they just may end up removing themselves from the gene pool. If after refusing the vaccine due to their own conduct (similar to a line of duty / conduct investigation in the military) then no medical care, insurance payment (medical or life), emergency response, not even an unattended death investigation, etc. should be made due to subsequent H1N1 infection. I mean even if they're independently wealthy they should not be provided ventilation, medication, nothing. All of that should be reserved for those who elected to remain in the gene pool.
Pretty harsh, maybe, but Darwin and life is like that...