Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Noveske N4 Recce or KAC SR15

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Kennett Square Pa
    Posts
    2,826
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ballsout View Post
    Trying to decide on which one of these I want to pick up as my next toy. A N4 Light Recce Low-Profile 16" or KAC Sr15. I have looked up reviews on both and the look very comparable. Any comments? pros cons? experience?
    The SR15 seems to be a very well made, well thought out rifle. I will be adding a couple to my safe after I wrap up my .308 rifles.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    0

    Noveske

    I like the Noveske barrels, hard to beat

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    285
    Feedback Score
    0
    Man, that's a tough call. Buy one of each.
    S/F

    Al

    "Hold on to your hate, it helps you stay focused"

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    136
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    More or less than a year ago, one of our favorite weapons photographers was pushing and posting Noveske, harder than he is doing KAC right now. Do you want whipped cream, or whipped cream and nuts on your ice cream?
    Last edited by bluedog; 12-06-09 at 22:35.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5
    Feedback Score
    0
    I've heard him say the same thing, but I believe he was referring to muscle memory and having to use another unit's AR platform or battlefield pickup, which won't have the ambi controls. Combat practicality/necessity VS a modded niche. In the heat of a fire fight, you may get smoked, if you have to fumble with the fire controls of your weapon system. The same can be said for the BAD lever, left side ejecting ARs or RediMags, as well.


    Larry also says that the 1911 should never be chambered in anything other than .45, and you shouldn't use a mag well.
    Last edited by 2cats; 12-09-09 at 12:30.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 2cats View Post
    Larry also says that the 1911 should never be chambered in anything other than .45, and you shouldn't use a mag well.
    This doesn't pertain to this thread. Also, tread lightly when questioning LAV and what he recommends. He is a highly respected member of this board and contributes alot to M4C and the shooting community as a whole.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    Nothing against Vickers (a lot of respect actually).

    But as I said I just take what people say who get paid to push a certain product with a grain of salt. Never said he would be less than honest about anything. Just a general rule of mine, and nothing specific about him.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    5
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by irishluck73 View Post
    This doesn't pertain to this thread. Also, tread lightly when questioning LAV and what he recommends. He is a highly respected member of this board and contributes alot to M4C and the shooting community as a whole.
    I merely meant to suggest that the original poster might be well served by considering alternatives that happen to suit him individually, rather than blindly assuming that this one particular size fits all. I share your respect for Vickers, but that doesn't mean that I think every shooter should do everything the way he does. If that bothers him, perhaps he can bully me himself.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    38
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    noveske

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    311
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I just went through the same thinking and went with the Noveske Low Profile (non-recce, but close enough).

    The winner for me was the barrel and the VLTOR upper. It's the best barrel out there for all around shooting (as opposed to precision).

    KAC has cool stuff, but I don't actually want KAC's proprietary stuff. While neat in theory, I don't want more different stuff. If I didn't already own other more standard AR15's I might lean more for the KAC.

    But both are good weapons.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •