Based on the theory that any firearm could potentially be used to commit crime, many major cities have funded 'buy back' programs to reduce the number of available weapons. Details vary, but the gist of such programs is that the city will purchase, with cash or gift cards, hand guns, rifles, shotguns or assault weapons from its citizens, no questions asked.
Typically, the city will return any stolen firearms to their owners and destroy the rest. It sounds like a good idea, but is the city actually getting a good return on the money invested? Critics answer in the negative, and cite a number of reasons of which the following are most commonly referenced.
1. They don't reduce gun crimes. Studies have questioned whether buy back programs have had an impact on gun violence. Richard Rosenfeld, professor of criminology at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, said an anaysis of programs in St. Louis in 1991 and 1994 found no demonstrable effect on firearm homicide or assault rates.
2. There are too many guns for the programs to make a difference. "It's like trying to drain the Pacific with a bucket," said Alex Tabarrek, research director at the Independent Institute, an Oakland, Cal. think tank. "More guns are going to flow in."
3. They are abused by gun dealers. Critics maintain that gun dealers and collectors use the program to rid themselves of otherwise unmarketable 'junk' guns, some of which may not even work. Some programs have tried to counter this problem by limiting the number of guns per person and taking only weapons in working condition.
4. Programs encourage profiteering. The amount a city pays for a weapon usually ranges from $25-$100. Some people, critics say, will buy hot or garbage weapons off the street and turn them in to the city at a profit.
5. Wrong people, wrong guns. Buy back detractors insist that people who turn in guns are not criminals, nor are their weapons used in crimes.
In general, critics view gun buy back programs as 'feel good' measures that make for good press but don't accomplish much. City officials counter that any weapon turned in is one less that can be involved in an accidental shooting or criminal pursuit. Even if the owner is not a criminal, they add, their gun could be seized in a break-in and used in a criminal enterprise.
Bookmarks