|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
True, but the actors did a really good job with their characters though!
Last edited by Saur; 12-29-09 at 02:25.
Movie was good then I bought the game for my son..disappointed!
I enjoyed too. Get's a 9.5 on the 10 scale from me....Clearly needs to be seen in it's 3D Imax format to be fully appreciated. The "big corporation wants your resources and will do what ever it takes to get them" message didn't bother me, nor did I see it as "liberal" as it's happened all through out history. Maybe a bit heavy handed in the message, but it's not like there is a lack of historical precedence for it. Just sayin'
Back on topic, The CGI/special effects were the new standard, and as simple as the plot was, it worked perfectly well with the movie for me. I thought the casting was quite good also, with (as is usually the case in a Hollywood movie..) the 'bad guy' being one dimensional but still well acted and effective.
Last edited by WillBrink; 12-29-09 at 10:15.
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I keep hearing this whole "secondary message" thing, and it's pretty annoying. Why can't people accept that wars are historically fought for two things territory and resources. It's part of the human condition. Why do so many people take offense to references of the human condition???
edited to add:
I have been thinking about the CGI since I last wrote. It seems that I am one of the only people that I know that is still critical of the CGI. Myself and a friend that is an engineer. I spent some time thinking about what it is that still doesn't do it for me, and I came to it. Even in Avatar the animators haven't been able to master cloth, and it's relationship to a body. As an artist this drives me insane, and once I realized that this is what was constantly jarring my ability to enjoy the CGI, I decided that I have to go back and see this movie again. THe reality though is that they still haven't mastered the way cloth, and clothing interacts with movement, and until they do this, I am going to be critical of CGI.
Last edited by Mac5.56; 12-29-09 at 10:29.
Mobocracy is alive and well in America.*
*Supporting Evidence for Hypothesis: The Internet
-me
'All of my firearms have 4 military features, a barrel, a trigger, a hammer, and a stock."
-coworker
Very true. I can't even imagine the math involved in the simple interaction with clothing and a body though. We are not talking simple X,Y,Z coordinate here we are talking hundreds or thousands of points of interaction at any given time, all constantly changing. I remember not that long ago when Fire and moving water were the issues. Obviously they have that figured out.
Last edited by kwelz; 12-29-09 at 11:43.
Join the 9-12 Patriots - http://912dc.org/
"Blue chicks are discusting. "
Once you go blue, you won't know what to do.
I think the folks that need to be concerned are the actors themselves. With the advances in cgi there will be no need for their 'physical services'. All that will be needed will be someone to do the voice(at a greatly reduced salary).
Just a thought...
"You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn't wear a veil
... you know, guys like that ain't got no manhood left anyway. So it's a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them."
Lt. Gen. James Mattis, USMC, former 1st Marine Division CO
Bookmarks