Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: FASTx (next gen FAST 1 for IO)

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,563
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MIKE G View Post
    but also have one of the original SOF insertion devices (do they even still make those?).
    If that is the manually inserted version, I think Chinook still sells them. I must admit I am interested in it, but we have liability issues. FAST is our issued kit, and if we use something else we are not certified on it may cause issues with our Head Shed. Price is always a factor in contracting. Worse case situation is that you could save someone's life, but loose your job if you could not show you were qualified to use it.
    ParadigmSRP.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    396
    Feedback Score
    0
    .....
    Last edited by MIKE G; 05-08-17 at 22:14.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,563
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Hmm, I guess I should look up the local 18D here on the FOB.

    BTW, if you want to make a training FAST, just drill a hole in the top of the handle and use a screwdriver to push it down to reset. A bit more realistic compared the the velcro verson in the Pyng training kit. Obviously there is the sharps concern with such a modification.
    ParadigmSRP.com

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    516
    Feedback Score
    0
    Definitely stick with what you are issued. And I agree that the FAST is a great tool for use on healthy adults wearing body armor the real limitations show up on the civilian side.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Neat piece of kit but OUUUCCCHHH!!!

    My experience with I/O needles is exclusively pediatric.

    Why did they choose the sternum rather than say a shin bone?
    Last edited by Gutshot John; 12-29-09 at 13:13.
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    1,563
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I suspect that a sternal IO is a bit faster than one put in at the tibia. Not sure how important this is for fluid resus, but probably more important for drugs.
    ParadigmSRP.com

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Anna, TX
    Posts
    6,315
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Iraq Ninja View Post
    I suspect that a sternal IO is a bit faster than one put in at the tibia. Not sure how important this is for fluid resus, but probably more important for drugs.
    So essentially the sternum is proximal to the vitals so drugs get there faster?
    It is bad policy to fear the resentment of an enemy. -Ethan Allen

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Ft Bragg, NC
    Posts
    185
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Gutshot John View Post

    Why did they choose the sternum rather than say a shin bone?
    Extremities get blown off but are survivable. Chances are if you've been in a blast and are alive then you have your sternum, but maybe not your arms and legs.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lex, VA.
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    I dunno, proximal humerus is pretty quick to central circulation. Fast enough to give adenosine. I watched a fluoroscope with a patient getting contrast through a prox humerus and the drug got to heart in less than a sec.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lex, VA.
    Posts
    84
    Feedback Score
    0
    Sternal is pretty convenient for healthy soldiers especially with extremity trauma. Another toy in the bag I guess.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •