Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 75 of 75

Thread: Judge dismisses all charges in Blackwater shooting

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I still don't understand how they were tried in the United States.

    Unfortunately by most accounts they DID mess up. Though the ambush they were responding to was real...it was over a long time before they ever showed up.

    War zone or not, you're generally still accountable for your rounds, and this is the kind of thing that made dangerous places that much more dangerous. There were towns where people simply did not go through anymore because some BW convoy hit a lady crossing the street going 90mph and didn't stop...the locals simply turned on Americans or turned a blind eye to the insurgency after that.

    So I don't weep for them, but I do think they got screwed because they were out of our jurisdiction(particularly for "machine gun used in the commission of a felony" and other such ridiculousness,) and were exempt from prosecution by the Iraqis. I think it's a case of if you screw the pooch badly enough, and screw it publicly enough, that you'll find yourself in the wrath of the US government without any backing from your firm. Prince says that he was screwed too, but I don't see that being the case...the Obama administration paid him roughly $300,000,000 before he sold Academi and bounced for Abu Dhabi.
    Last edited by thopkins22; 10-24-14 at 10:09.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    1,791
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    This is why I think contractors conducting security ops in a war zone is a difficult situation. I know some guys that flew for Blackwater (or another sub) who are infuriated by this.
    "Those who do can't explain; those who don't can't understand"...

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Baja
    Posts
    2,935
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by thopkins22 View Post
    I still don't understand how they were tried in the United States.

    Unfortunately by most accounts they DID mess up. Though the ambush they were responding to was real...it was over a long time before they ever showed up.

    War zone or not, you're generally still accountable for your rounds, and this is the kind of thing that made dangerous places that much more dangerous. There were towns where people simply did not go through anymore because some BW convoy hit a lady crossing the street going 90mph and didn't stop...the locals simply turned on Americans or turned a blind eye to the insurgency after that.

    So I don't weep for them, but I do think they got screwed because they were out of our jurisdiction(particularly for "machine gun used in the commission of a felony" and other such ridiculousness,) and were exempt from prosecution by the Iraqis. I think it's a case of if you screw the pooch badly enough, and screw it publicly enough, that you'll find yourself in the wrath of the US government without any backing from your firm. Prince says that he was screwed too, but I don't see that being the case...the Obama administration paid him roughly $300,000,000 before he sold Academi and bounced for Abu Dhabi.
    No its outrageous, they should get off scot-free and be triumphed as hero's. [sarcasm off]

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,935
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by skydivr View Post
    This is why I think contractors conducting security ops in a war zone is a difficult situation. I know some guys that flew for Blackwater (or another sub) who are infuriated by this.
    So why is DoS allowed to do it? Why are they not required to use DoD personnel or <gasp!> DoS employees?

    Plausible deniability anyone?
    What if this whole crusade's a charade?
    And behind it all there's a price to be paid
    For the blood which we dine
    Justified in the name of the holy and the divine…

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,663
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Collateral damage is only acceptable if it stems from a government drone strike.

    Thrown under the bus for a political agenda, and convicted almost entirely based on conflicting testimony by witnesses.

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •