D. None of the above
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sam Brownback
John Cox
Rudy Giuliani
Duncan Hunter
John McCain
Ron Paul
Mitt Romney
D. None of the above
Paul A. Hotaling
Alias Training & Security Services, LLC
Paul@aliastraining.com
757-215-1959 (Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM)
757-985-9586 (After Hours)
www.aliastraining.com
I'm not a republican (or a member of any other party), but on that list Ron Paul is far and away the best choice, probably of any we've had in decades.
Unfortunately he's also unelectable.
I agree with him on just about everything (that I know about) except his position on the war in Iraq. However, since RKBA is my #1 issue that eclipses all others combined, he's clearly the right man.
If you choose none of the above, I think we'd like to ask what your nominee of choice would be.
“The practical success of an idea, irrespective of its inherent merit, is dependent on the attitude of the contemporaries." Nikola Tesla
I have to agree.. The party is really lacking a candidate that the country will get behind. Thompson could be that candidate, but who really knows.
Remind your democrat Friends (that is if you have any) that the country will have been run for the last 2 decades by 2 different family names. If the hildabeast goes in 08 then we will have to endure almost 3 decades of it (if she makes it once she most likely will get re-elected, the country did slick willy for 2 terms). Republican or Damorat, that is to much like a monarchy.
I am so tired of the "lesser of two evils" selection that we've been faced with and I really don't want to have to cast my vote in November 08 for an "Other Than Hillary" candidate. I want to cast it for a man I really believe in. While Reagan was THE man...I find it very hard to believe that there aren't any other's out there who can't step into his shoes. I find myself very excited by the possibility, albiet slight, chance that he'll throw his name in the running.
Fred Thompson
Bookmarks