
Originally Posted by
decodeddiesel
How is the height of the ADM mount compared to the LaRue and stock mount? When I had my TA33 I replaced the stock mount with the LaRue and found that the LaRue was shorter. This is a problem on a carbine with a fixed FSP as it "shadows" in the optic. The stock mount was not that bad, but the LaRue was so short it was a bit of an issue. Still though the stock mount these TA33s come in is garbage.
I can't find my figures for mount height comparisons, but I have played "mix and match" with several mounts. From lowest to highest in my recollection (when mounting a compact ACOG):
TA51 (full sized ACOG mount)
ADM
LaRue LT-105
TA60 (compact sized ACOG mount)
I actually like the TA60 a lot. It provides a lot of height for low power (1.5x) ACOGs so that interference from a FSB is minimal. With 3x ACOGS, like the TA33, it is less of an issue. The TA60 is also tough. The ADM mount appears to be a better clamping device than the LaRue LT-105, although both will do.
'That whole effort was held together by sweat, shame, and a tiny bit of pride.' -- Son of Commander Paisley
Bookmarks