Ok. I never have seen any QD hardware in person, I did not know if that hole was sized correctly for it. Thank you.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ok. I never have seen any QD hardware in person, I did not know if that hole was sized correctly for it. Thank you.
I have a JP VTAC tube on another rifle and it came with 2 of those sling mounts. I had to use the backer from the TRX tube but the stud screwed right in. I used a flat washer that fits the hole to keep it from falling through.
This works good enough for a bi-pod mount but I wouldn't trust it for a sling, can't really say why but I prefer the VTAC sling mount that attaches to the top of the rail.
![]()
The JP-VTAC and the VTAC Extreme are different products. The JP-VTAC is set up for the the sling swivel attachment point - the Extreme is not.
I liked the older VTAC on my old setup...comfortable and well made.
![]()
Last edited by OutlawDon; 10-09-10 at 11:58.
Sorry for the side note, but I really do dislike the look of the Magpul RVG's.
It is a pure aesthetic thing. I know taste is subjective but for me they look large and block like or rather clunky looking. On the RVG I also do not like the looks of the double screws/hex heads either. The MVG is nicer in this area due to the attachment difference, but they just don't do it for me.
As for function I am sure they work, but my stubbies were pretty much just finger stops and I know you can cut down the RVG, but they just aren't my thing. They look like an afterthought and a growth on the rifle. Just not sexy.
And yes I know sexy has nothing to do with function.![]()
to my eyes it appears the RVG and MVG have the same profile except for the taller part for the rail attachment and the screws. is this the part you don't like?
never push a wrench...
Bookmarks