|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As with everyone else LT is far superior.
I own both the LaRue and A.R.M.S. mount.
I'm happy with both since I've never had any problems with either. For me, the return to zero works quite well on both.
- Eric
I own a ARMS and Larue mount for two of my Comp M3s. They have both been reliable and have a constant zero. I also own a Bobro mount for one of my scopes, and I have to say that I prefer the Bobro. However, with ARMS and Larue, you have every mounting option/configuration possible. Bobro are fairly new to the M4 community and do not have the multiple configurations like the other manufacturers do. If you were just mounting one optic, I recommend the Bobro. I think the engineering behind there clamping design is superior. Just my two cents, it comes down to your preference.
Wait a minute............You mean other companies make mounts? I thought only LaRue did................this could complicate things................![]()
I doubt I'd ever buy anything from that nutcase LaRue. If he had something unique that I needed, I might... It's just hard to support a company whose principal is such a douche.
Keep it on topic or take it to PM.
Similar experience here. Happy with both companies. IIRC, I have an ARMS #19 for my ACOG, and LT mounts for my flashlight and Aimpoint T-1. Both have been superb in terms of tight lock-on and return to zero.
I think LaRue might eek out ahead though, since they have an already built-in tension adjustment.
Finally, I am not a HSLD guy, so take my opinion with a grain of salt. Some of the HSLD guys report that their ARMS shit always breaks so...YMMV.
Bookmarks