Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Red dot positioning: on top of barrel vs on top of receiver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,306
    Feedback Score
    0

    Red dot positioning: on top of barrel vs on top of receiver

    What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a red dot optic closer or farther from your eyes? Is one way better than the other?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    197
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    I've noticed that running an Aimpoint micro further out is easier and more forgiving if you can't get a consistent cheek weld fast. An example of this is running the micro rds further out such as an AK with the Ultimak gas tube. Finding the dot is faster and easier since you increase your radius and field of vision.



    The main drawback of running it further out is you put more weight forward and in doing so it makes it harder to shoot targets that appear in your peripheral vision because the centrifugal force has increased as you swing the rifle left or right to engage targets. Ideally you would want it to be a balance between having fast acquisition, increased field of vision, and balanced weight. Everyone is different so you should test and see for yourself while keeping in mind there is legitimate physics and human anatomy involved in this process.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    714
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    i like my aimpoint further out. directly above the barrel nut if possible. it feels faster to aquire and makes focusing easier and i have les of a tendancy to close one eye. ymmv

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    northern ohio
    Posts
    298
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    red dot positioning

    been mounting them just past the delta ring,meaning the rear is past it.
    ken hackathorn turned me on to it 10 yrs ago as my eyes do funny things with red dots

    all my Ar's Rds are mounted this way, but regular scopes are on the flat top
    doesn't get any faster or better for me

    am trying to transition to a h-1 from eotecs and a/-points. its on a games trainibng gun. not convinced but am shooting a 3 gun this weekend will now when its over cause they shoot at less than 50 yds due to range. everything will go very fast.

    try it u will like it

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    714
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    not a fan of the h-1 t-1 style red dots. they give me the sensation of looking threw a straw. i like the less encroachment style of the m2/m4 series of RDS

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,932
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Indy View Post
    not a fan of the h-1 t-1 style red dots. they give me the sensation of looking threw a straw. i like the less encroachment style of the m2/m4 series of RDS
    what???

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    818
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by vicious_cb View Post
    what???

    He said he puts it far out, the farther away it is the smaller it gets.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    S. Florida
    Posts
    316
    Feedback Score
    0
    Put the RDS in a straight up mount and keep it on the receiver, preferably as far back as possible to leave room for a BUIS. As you move the sight forward the further you go the more you are looking at it, instead of through it with your dominant eye and past it with your non-dominant eye. Check out where the SF and Delta guys mount them! The only reason for a cantilever mount is to make room for a magnifier or NOD on the receiver.
    Billy

    US Army Retired, NRA Life member, M/C mechanic, Gunsmith

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •