Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Which Optic

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,343
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)

    Which Optic

    Shooting 0-200yds on a Noveske Afghan with Sully stock. Requirements are: light enough for offhand shooting, clear glass, simple, fairly fast and simple reticle that is also capable of semi-precision up to 200 yds. I have 2 Aimpoints so it doesn't need to compete with an rds and doesn't need to be super precise. No more than $1400 with mount. NF 1-4, NF 2.5-10X24, NF 2.5-10X32, Leupy 1.5 MK4, TA33 or TA 11?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    256
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    for 0-200 yards, Id go with the NF 1-4
    Last edited by matt86; 04-08-10 at 21:14.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    0
    The 1.5-5 Mk 4 MR/T is very clear and allows precision shooting considerably further than 200. I've used one with good results out to 500M on an 18" targets (even tried it at 700M, but we won't go there).

    The Vortex 1-4 PST is a possible, but it won't be available until around June.

    I went with a NF 2.5-10x32 for a SPR-ish build I'm doing, but it might be overkill for 200 Yds and under - or maybe not if you're shooting small targets.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    95
    Feedback Score
    0
    All good choices. I always go with Aimpoints and ACOG's on guns I have to depend my life on. Of the current crop the TA-33 is the best.
    LE Firearms Instuctor - Handgun, Rifle, Shotgun and Automatic Weapons.
    LE Factory Armorer: Colt, Beretta, Glock, Remington, Ruger, SIG, S&W, Springfield Armory.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    I go where I'm told.
    Posts
    2,167
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    The trij accupoints are righteous.
    Acta Non Verba

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    43
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    From 0 to 200 you dont need a magnified optic, its just not worth the weight at that close of a range. I would go with a quality red dot. But if I had to choose for you list, TA33. FMJs-of-Freedom
    FMJs-of-Freedom



    Krink: If the bullet doesn't hit em the 4 foot fireball will.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,343
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FMJs-of-Freedom View Post
    From 0 to 200 you dont need a magnified optic, its just not worth the weight at that close of a range. I would go with a quality red dot. But if I had to choose for you list, TA33. FMJs-of-Freedom
    I have 2 T1s already. Wanted something different. Is there something NOT on my list you'd suggest?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,854
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Aimpoint M4s

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    2,343
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    I have 2 T1s and want some magnification. It doesn't have to be my go to optic as the T1s fill that role. I don't think a 3rd Aimpoint is the answer but I wouldn't mind trying the M4s someday.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2,854
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I'd go with the NF 1-4X if you think you'll not be shooting more than 600yds; also depends upon your vision.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •