Recently in my area there has been a large increase of Ruger Pistol Caliber Carbines hitting the FFL's as local departments switch over to AR's. Looking at past armed conflicts one can see were pistol caliber carbines were used by most of the major powers from WWII until Vietnam and today many police departments still use the MP-5 or Car-9.
Now before everyone jumps in with its better to use a 5.56, 6.8, 7.62 for a gun fight I already totally agree 100% with that recommendation. My contention is that there must be a valid use for such pistol caliber carbines even if its only over that of a handgun with its enhanced accuracy and slightly longer effective range in todays world.
Looking at what my Ruger PC-9 carbine can do with +P or +P+ ammunition it appears with my set-up accurate hits to 150yds can be made with ease and with modern bonded bullets one would not have to worry about close impacts at the higher carbine velocities fragmenting the bullet and retarding penetration.
Now I don't know what the engineered expansion window is for the bonded bullets in Doc's recommended list is but I think it would be safe to say that the higher velocities from a 16" barrel would extend the range over a handgun that the bullet would expand some what, plus past that expansion window one still has a .355 caliber hole poker out to as far as one can hit.
Accuracy should be better over range when compared to a handgun so with all the pluses what is the negative side of pistol caliber carbines in 9mm, .40S&W or .45acp?


Reply With Quote

Bookmarks