deleted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
deleted.
Last edited by Karcas; 02-17-11 at 12:19.
Deleted.
Last edited by amd5007; 02-17-11 at 12:50.
NevadaGunOwners.com | Reno4x4.com | GOA Life Member
Del-ton...another shit brand. Freedom Group should buy them to add to their collection of shitty AR makers.
Praise be to the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1
Owner of MI-TAC, LLC .
@MichiganTactical
There is a decidedly devious backsplash from The Chart.
Some companies are using it as a checklist for marketing purposes. This means that they need to find other ways to cut corners/costs. Softer than spec screws and pins, suspect carrier key material, incorrect MPI rejection criteria, lower than spec pressure in HPT, incorrect shot-peening method... the list goes on and on. The Chart revision that I'm working on attempts to address some of this, but these cost cutting measures are far more devious, far easier to lie about, and much harder to check. Looking at carrier key staking is easy. Getting metallurgical testing done to see what material the key is made from is another matter entirely.
Last edited by Dave L.; 02-17-11 at 13:35. Reason: added a ? mark
Praise be to the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, my fingers for battle. Psalm 144:1
Owner of MI-TAC, LLC .
@MichiganTactical
This is a good point.
Even as the keeper of The Chart, I am constantly amazed at the fervor it causes, and how antsy people get about this brand or that brand being on it. For a standard, M4 pattern AR carbine, there are four brands I would personally consider and I would chose them based on my budget and acknowledge that there would be sacrifices for doing same. I see absolutely no reason in the universe to deviate from those brands. There are others that offer, IMHO, more than the standard M4 in terms of barrel quality, gas-tube length, or virtual redesign of the platform, but for a base model there are four.
Bookmarks