Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 86

Thread: What Charging Handle Setup Do You Use?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    West of the Atlantic
    Posts
    1,803
    Feedback Score
    0
    Almost all of my rifles now run the BCM Gunfighter with a modified PRI Combat Latch. I have run hundreds of rounds through each of the Mod3's, Mod4's (still run a mod3 on an SPR) and the PRI latch conversion. For myself the PRI latch is hands down (not even close) a far better option. I don't think BCM will produce a latch on the Gunfighter in a similar configuration as the PRI when they can sell me a standard Gunfighter and a PRI latch to boot.

    I have had far too many requests from this and other sites to do this conversion for others. Sorry, I just don't have the time.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo45 View Post
    Well, as stated, it appears that the mod 5 is simply smaller in length, similar to a std latch. But, the face of the latch is taller than a std latch, due to the extra meat extending the bottom of the latch face.

    But, for those "10" of us (sarcasm) that get pinched with mod 3 and 4's, this mod 5 appears to not be prone to pinching, since there is no gap at the top of the latch to close and pinch you, when operating the latch. To me, if not intentional by the design, the mod 5 does appear to aleviate the problem that "10" of us experienced.

    I wonder why Larry requested this mod 5, if pinching wasn't an issue? The change in length of the latch doesn't seem as dramatic, as the reduction in the latch face height, compared to the mod 4....

    Yes there are about 10 of you that have a problem.

    Pinching was never a concern with Mr. Vickers. Why? Because, he wears gloves (clue).

    The reason he requested the smaller latch was because the snag hazard when wearing a chest harness/plates.

    Nice try though assuming it was because of pinching.


    C4
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 04-22-10 at 21:09.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Stuarts Draft, VA
    Posts
    930
    Feedback Score
    0
    4 PRI gas busters on 4 AR's. I was always under the impression that they were the best CH's - then BCM (who obviously waited for me to shell out the cash for the PRI's) came out with their CH at a much cheaper price.

    I have not had any issues with the PRI's so I am sticking with them for now.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mmike87 View Post
    4 PRI gas busters on 4 AR's. I was always under the impression that they were the best CH's - then BCM (who obviously waited for me to shell out the cash for the PRI's) came out with their CH at a much cheaper price.

    I have not had any issues with the PRI's so I am sticking with them for now.
    I have run PRI's for years. Broke one last year.

    Switched all my personal guns to the BCM MOD 4 and 5.


    C4
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 04-22-10 at 21:46.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    1,114
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    BCM Mod 4
    "Buy once, cry once. Or not. Many of you will undoubtedly be zombies one day. I'd prefer if you were zombies with sub-par gear."

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    406
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Yes there are about 10 of you that have a problem.

    Pinching was never a concern with Mr. Vickers. Why? Because, he wears gloves (clue).

    The reason he requested the smaller latch was because the snag hazard when wearing a chest harness/plates.

    Nice try though assuming it was because of pinching.


    C4
    Oh, make no mistake Grant, I assume nothing, and am real good with clues. That's just my nature. But you are way off....there are more than 10 of us that were pinched with gunfighters...more like 11 or 12. Don't make me resurrect my thread, and Frogman's thread, and the other one! J/k, I have no desire to start that battle again. Besides, I don't have time, I need to get to the store, and buy some gloves. I keep forgetting to pick some up.

    Its just that the slight difference in length between the mod 4 and 5, doesn't really convince me that a huge reduction in snagability (is that a word?) would be realized. Then again, my mod 4 is not sharp like a new one would be, and this mod 5 is a bit rounder at the edge, and radiuses (a mod I did on my mod 4, too) so it probably would snag a bit less, I suppose, though. I like that. I also remember when some members griped about the mod 3 and 4's being too sharp, and snag prone, and were quickly shot down by those that wore gloves, and "didn't have that problem". I guess Larry did, though, and when he speaks, folks listen.

    All jest aside, I am glad this mod 5 came out. It should prove to be a better alternative for me, Larry, and at least a dozen others. Seriously, I will order one with my new BCM upper, that is due this summer.
    Last edited by Jimbo45; 04-22-10 at 22:16.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    28
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thank you for the great pics grant! Nice to see they are in stock too!

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimbo45 View Post
    Oh, make no mistake Grant, I assume nothing, and am real good with clues. That's just my nature. But you are way off....there are more than 10 of us that were pinched with gunfighters...more like 11 or 12. Don't make me resurrect my thread, and Frogman's thread, and the other one! J/k, I have no desire to start that battle again. Besides, I don't have time, I need to get to the store, and buy some gloves. I keep forgetting to pick some up.

    Its just that the slight difference in length between the mod 4 and 5, doesn't really convince me that a huge reduction in snagability (is that a word?) would be realized. Then again, my mod 4 is not sharp like a new one would be, and this mod 5 is a bit rounder at the edge, and radiuses (a mod I did on my mod 4, too) so it probably would snag a bit less, I suppose, though. I like that. I also remember when some members griped about the mod 3 and 4's being too sharp, and snag prone, and were quickly shot down by those that wore gloves, and "didn't have that problem". I guess Larry did, though, and when he speaks, folks listen.

    All jest aside, I am glad this mod 5 came out. It should prove to be a better alternative for me, Larry, and at least a dozen others. Seriously, I will order one with my new BCM upper, that is due this summer.
    When you hold the 4 and 5 at the same time, the 5 is much smaller and the snag hazard is about as much as it is with a standard GI latch.

    Long latches have always been more susceptible to snagging on kit and and unlocking the bolt. I have never heard Ken or LAV mention that they were sharp in anyway (nor do I believe that they are sharp).

    If folks believe that the Mod 5 works best for them, then great (no matter the reason).


    C4

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Yute View Post
    Thank you for the great pics grant! Nice to see they are in stock too!
    Took them just for you.


    C4

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    122
    Feedback Score
    0
    Twenty + yrs of M16s and ARs, I have never had an issue with the standard charging handle in any environment.

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •