|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Member
[QUOTE=Alex V;634812]From what I understand "revolutionalymuslim dot com' is not based int he US. Therefor, the FBI and ATF can do nothing.
The man on the street that was interviewed by the CNN reporter in the video was identified as one of the founders of the website Revolution Muslim, and the interview was conducted on a NY city sidewalk.
Site Sponsor
Originally Posted by bubabootie
Except for a blip from the OP, the exact opposite has been expressed here. Please read thoroughly before posting.
Last edited by Safetyhit; 04-23-10 at 18:35.
"Facit Omina Voluntas = The Will Decides" - Army Chief
Senior Member
Read the thread before you post again.
Member
I'm not sure why anything I posted would be construed as giving in to terrorists. Perhaps you're referring to my statement of not blaming corporations or individuals for backing down. Well Safety, most people don't want to have to go in to hiding for the rest of their lives. These extremists mean business and will attempt to kill you. Hence my idea of safety in numbers and not hanging any single person out to dry.
Anyway, there seems to be a luke warm reception to my idea. I haven't heard many people jumping on board for a t-shirt. Plus, after further contemplation, I think I'd be more concerned with the Feds knocking on my door than an extremist. The First Amendment protects speech and text, but it's a little fuzzy on images. If an image is meant to incite anger or intimidation, I believe it would be classified as a hate crime. California law already bans "threatening displays of swastikas and burning crosses". I think they recently added nooses to the list. I wouldn't mind pissing off some extremists, but don't want to mess with the Feds. I'm highly allergic to PMITA penitentiaries.
Last edited by LMT42; 04-23-10 at 19:24.
Site Sponsor
Not a shot at you, but let's clarify:
Networks such as Comedy Central, the ones that always seek to push the envelope via South Park and several other far worse programs, are a plenty big part of the problem. They are a leftist entity and spew humor that is almost always progressive in nature (SP exempt, OK LL?). I don't watch their shows beyond rapid searching and clips I see on other networks, but it takes very little time and intellect to see what they are made of.
As such, they need to stand by their base values and support such tolerance for their own programs as well as their producers. The muslims are displaying intolerance, so the CC network has compromised it's own values.
"Facit Omina Voluntas = The Will Decides" - Army Chief
Banned
i think southpark is generally pretty libertarian, rather than "liberal" in the common sense of the word.
they're pretty anti-conservative, but they're just as anti-libfag.
Site Sponsor
Count me in for a t-shirt. It is constructive to wear one. This will establish you as one that doesn't give in to the political correctness that has hurt the country. I'm not sure if this is tongue in cheek or not. I do know that all the so-called "moderate" Muslims haven't stood up to the fundamentalists that are behind the terrorism; many of them danced in the streets of their countries after 9/11. Don't see many hitting the circuit to denounce their fellow Muslims. It would seem that many voice their true opinions by not speaking out.
Member
Hell ya I'd buy one. For several people I know as well as me. Do tell when the run starts.
"Calling an illegal alien an undocumented immigrant is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist"
If you can't get behind our troops feel free to stand in front of them
Banned
Just because something is un-PC, edgy,abrasive, unfiltered or whatever you wanna call it, dosent make it leftist. The Goobacks episode is a prime example
"Bill O'Reilly: On my right is pissed-off white-trash redneck conservative and on my left is aging hippie liberal douche."
The whole episode is just social commentary on the ridiculous things on both sides. If you'd like something more one sided, this is more like it.http://www.breakmobile.com/index/fck...rth-day_1.html
Member
This was forwarded to me a couple of years ago by my Dad. I have not been able to find the original source, so I am not sure what credentials the author has. I am posting it 'as is', without editing.
Caveat: I am not making any judgements regarding 'moderate' Muslims or our Constitutional right to freedom of religion by posting this.
Whether you agree with it as a whole, in part, or not at all; it should stimulate some serious analysis regarding Islam in America.
CAN A GOOD MUSLIM BE A GOOD AMERICAN?
1) Theologically- NO. Because his allegiance is to Allah, the moon God of Arabia.
2) Religiously- NO. Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam (Quran, 2:256).
3) Scripturally- NO. because his allegiance is to the five pillars of Islam and the Quran (Koran).
4) Geographically- NO. Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.
5) Socially- NO. Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians and Jews.
6) Politically- NO. Because he must submit to the mullahs (spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and Destruction of America, the great Satan.
7) Domestically- NO. Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him (Quran 4:34).
8) Intellectually- NO. Because he cannot accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be corrupt.
9) Philosophically- NO. Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran do not allow freedom of religion and expression. Democracy and Islam cannot co-exist. Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.
10) Spiritually- NO. Because when we declare "one nation under God", the Christian's God is loving and kind, while Allah is NEVER referred to as heavenly father, nor is he ever called love in The Quran's 99 excellent names.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks