My interpretation of the new lightweight/KISS trend.

[The Dumb Gun Collector]

Hey guys,

G&R tactical put together a new upper for me this weekend. It is a DD lightweight barrel, DD receiver and BCG. I forgot to order a charging handle so I have a no-name one in there until I decide if I want something else. Anyway, it has a DD light rail (7) and I am running a X200 at 3 o'clock. I was aware of the current trend towards 12 O'clock mounts, but I am not yet a convert I was looking to minimize the amount of railestate on this one. Of course I put my old DD fixed sight, which I love, back on my rifle. I put the thing on my old Colt Tactical lower. You will notice I put an A1 grip and a standard M4 stock on the gun. I am undecided on a sling, but will probably go with the Vickers.

I ordered a T1 mount but I haven't decided whether to replace my M4. The M4 is heavier, but I think it is a better all-around RDS. It is 2 MOA, and it takes batteries that are very available. I also like the larger aperture. I have always been one of those "keep both eyes open and it isn't an issue" guys. But, when I was in a shoothouse the weekend before last I noticed that the M4 was easier to acquire from ready. I am not knocking the T1, I have on on my 416, but I am thinking I might sell it and get another M4.

[The Dumb Gun Collector]

I moved the M4 up a notch. I wanted it back as far as possible, but didn't like the idea of it bumping against the rear sight.

[USMC03]

Beautiful carbine, Greg!!!


By going with a Micro T1, you could drop the weight by another 1/3 pound .... doesn't sound like much but you can definately feel the weight difference in your hands.

A Micro T1 in a LaRue mount is 6.4 oz ..... M4 / M4S in a LaRue mount is 12.8 oz

[The Dumb Gun Collector]

Grumble, grumble. Yeah, I know. Heck, with the Daniel Defense mount (which I already own!) It would be even lighter. I am considering it. The question is, is 6 or so 0z worth the smaller aperture, the larger dot, and the shorter battery life?

[lethal dose]

Clean build! Is that an hk mag? Using gi mags will also save you a little weight. Got any numbers for us?

[lethal dose]

Grumble, grumble. Yeah, I know. Heck, with the Daniel Defense mount (which I already own!) It would be even lighter. I am considering it. The question is, is 6 or so 0z worth the smaller aperture, the larger dot, and the shorter battery life?

Honestly, I'd say yes. I find the micro to be fast. The 4 moa can be even faster then the 2 moa in cqb situations. I've not noticed aperature size affecting my speed, personally. As for battery life, that's virtually a non-issue with all new aimpoints, in my opinion. Being that it'll be so light, I think you'll come to greatly appreciate it, especially during multi day carbine courses.

[The Dumb Gun Collector]

Naw, it is a black D&H mags.

I have a T1 on my short rifle, and I haven't noticed the dot being any easier to pick up. Each of them can be turned up to obnoxious intensity. I have, however, noticed the 4moa being a bit of a pain for 200 yard shots.

Hell, I don't know. Maybe I should flip a coin.

[lethal dose]

I hear ya. I do this from my phone, so it's hard to see the details. Yeah, I suppose either way you can't go wrong. Let us know either way. I'd like to see the total weight.

[Sam]

Nice gun Greg. Would have came in handy in the class last week.

[TehLlama]

Grumble, grumble. Yeah, I know. Heck, with the Daniel Defense mount (which I already own!) It would be even lighter. I am considering it. The question is, is 6 or so 0z worth the smaller aperture, the larger dot, and the shorter battery life?

Battery life would be of no consequence: the only argument is the availability of AAs over CR2034s.

The 2MOA dot is an advantage, but I'd say the weight would be more of a consideration on the already lightweight rifle. If you were running a medium contour 16", then the CompM4, but for a lightweight setup, I'd say the H-1 would be worth it.

If you're not running NV, go H-1. Save a touch more money, and that's one of the few other areas the CompM4 really takes the lead. Otherwise, the smaller tube isn't a disadvantage.