|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Question:
Which round has lower visible flash? Typically, Federal seems to load ammo with lower flash powders.
http://atk.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=118&item=1046
Press Releases
Press Releases
ATK Awarded Five-Year FBI Ammunition Contract Valued at $95 Million
ATK 5.56 Caliber Ammunition Products Fulfill Duty and Training Requirements
FBI-Award Ammunition to be Manufactured at ATK's Facility in Anoka, Minn.
Nov 3, 2010
MINNEAPOLIS, Nov. 3, 2010 /PRNewswire/ -- ATK (NYSE: ATK) announced today that it has received a contract from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for 5.56 caliber duty and training ammunition. The contract is a five-year, Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) agreement with a maximum value of $95 million. ATK will produce the mission-specific ammunition at its facility in Anoka, Minnesota.
ATK used its core capability of ammunition technology development to create a customized solution to meet the needs of the FBI. The duty load is based on Federal Premium's 62-grain Tactical Bonded projectile, which excels at barrier penetration, while the training ammunition features 55-grain and 50-grain bullet options ideal for the needs of the Bureau. Production of the duty round was tailored to the specifications of the FBI and is already underway. Deliveries are expected to begin by the end of 2010.
"This contract is the result of a focused effort to expand our business in an important strategic market," said Ron Johnson, President of ATK's Security and Sporting group. "Our core ammunition technology provides the ideal platform for meeting this important customer need."
ATK is a premier aerospace and defense company with operations in 24 states, Puerto Rico, and internationally, and revenues of approximately $4.8 billion. News and information can be found on the Internet at www.atk.com.
Certain information discussed in this press release constitutes forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Although ATK believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Forward-looking information is subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Among those factors are: changes in governmental spending, budgetary policies and product sourcing strategies; the competitive ammunition technology environment; the terms and timing of awards and contracts; and economic conditions. ATK undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. For further information on factors that could impact ATK, and statements contained herein, please refer to ATK's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Media Contact:
Investor Contact:
Jason Nash
Jeff Huebschen
Phone: 800-322-2342 (ext. 3878)
Phone: 952-351-2929
E-mail: pressroom@atk.com
E-mail: jeff.huebschen@atk.com
SOURCE ATK
Very interesting Doc thanks for the info. It seems the FBI did their homework before choosing this round; something that offers good performence out of the various barrel lengths employed across their agency.
I will definitly pick some of this stuff up if it gets released to the public as well. Might be a nice alternative to the ever elusive TAP T2, especially out of a 10.5" barrel......
Doc, love your posts. While I know the XM556FBIT3 is a better overall combat round than the SOST round, does the SOST Mk318 Mod 0 ammo outshine the XM556FBIT3 in any single category (range, accuracy, lethality, barrier blind, feeding, etc, Hague issues aside)? If not, is XM556FBIT3 worth the additional cost (surely twice the cost of SOST ammo, which I can get for .78/round). Thanks again.
Has anyone seen either of these rounds become available for individual officer or civilian purchase yet?
What did your results show?
Would the results be much different (inside of the 100 yd mark) if you were shooting the .223 version (Federal LE223T3)? Or would the differences only show at greater distances?
Basically I'm just trying to guage the "effective range" that each load would give.
Thanks.
It looks like this stuff has hit the streets. Has anyone done any formal or informal testing on it.
http://www.luckygunner.com/5-56x45-6...eral-20-rounds
LG's prices are high its out there for cheaper I just used them as an example.
There was a previous run of contract over-run white box Federal XM556FBIT3 about year and a half ago, I scooped 460rds from a Vender on this site. The RXM556T3 is the same, only didnt pass FBI standards for one reason or another. Should fine though.
Edit* BTW..I notice this RXM556T3 does not come on stripper clips, as does the XM556FBIT3 I have does. Just an observation.
Last edited by Evil1969SS>LS6; 07-26-13 at 00:34. Reason: Updated
Bookmarks