But wouldn't you feel more comfortable shooting a 75 gr BTHP, designed for improved terminal effectiveness, as opposed to a much lighter jacketed round? Sure, it will do the job, but if you're using a sample size of 1 shot, you're gonna want the better bullet.
Regarding your comment about the military using 1/11 barrels, keep in mind that the military was limited to a specific, light weight round (SS109) at the time. This was likely due to NATO compatibility and sourcing concerns. Add more shooters, burst and full auto, and different ballistic objectives into the mix, and your argument is akin to comparing two types of produce. Also witness the move, even in the military, to heavier ammunition, vis a vis Mk262 and Mk318 ammunition.
See for more info on SS109 development and objectives: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS109
I agree with your point that useful and useless are terms that are dependent on the speaker's intended use. Having said that, as I've said before on this forum, look at your audience. More self defense/ammo versatility for high round count days/professional end users here.
As opposed to the "here, hold my beer while I shoot this old toaster" crowd at other sites.
BTW: for me, 1/9 is useless.
The advice above is worth exactly what you paid for it.
Bookmarks