Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 66

Thread: Elcan Spector DR

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    4,409
    Feedback Score
    34 (100%)
    I'm fairly certain this topic has been covered ad nausem. I would do a SEARCH function.

    Here's my take on the Elcan DR et al.

    A know a lot of SOF guys who like them.
    I also know alot of SOF guys who do not.

    I have owned one, not sure which evo it was. My RET was amber which my eyes & brain do not prefer in most terra firma diurnal engagements. I would prefer RED which it is now.

    The main issues have been the Zero shift & the ARMS mount.

    There have been a number of units, elements, TEAMs who have procurred them and when implementing the optics (read Zeroing) several of them literally falling off the weapon from recoil impulse etc. & ZERO shift that turned a lot of people off.

    Understandably so in any Danger Close / In Extremis situation etc. ;-/

    That reality has been difficult to overcome. Having said that, some people contend that the levers were not adjusted correctly. Some feel it is an inherent design flaw etc. Some people don't care for the owner or his business ethics etc.

    I'm ONLY disseminating info I have and not making judgment regarding this.

    As D90King says the S&B Short DOT is/was the shizzle.

    Do a search function and it will ellucidate itself to you as D90King alludes to.

    There are a number of new variable power optics (i.e. 1X6 1X8 et al) that would probably be more efficacious in your endeavor. Again research, read, assimilate data & process it.

    The concept of flipping the optic for optimal shot placement once threat is aquired is no doubt ideal. But the reality of having your optic fall off or shift in POA/POI is a bigger conceptual issue in my eyes...

    Here's a fairly decent link to a test addressing POA/POI, ZERO shift change specifically.

    http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubb...Number=1806056



    Overall, to me if Elcan can eliminate (or has) those concerns I think it's a potentially good optic. Weight is a moot point in my eyes since any decent varaiable is going to weigh more due to glass elements and glass quality anyways.

    Hope that helps answer your question.

    YMMV...
    Last edited by VooDoo6Actual; 06-06-10 at 13:28.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    127
    Feedback Score
    0
    My buddy on SF has one issued, as does his team and he says they love them. They are not experiencing the zero shift at all. He said they have engaged targets out to 600M with them. I just picked one up also. I am going to the range today and plan on comparing it to my NF 1-4. So, far just a comparison at the house I can tell you a few things. The NF glass is not even close to being as clear the Elcan. Mine is the 1-4 elcan. The NF illumination is NOT visible in full sunlight, where the Elcan is. The NF does have a more forgiving eye relief. The Elcan, you need to be very close to it to get the proper picture. The Elcan can illuminate just a red dot or the full reticule, which is a nice feature. The field of view is slightly better on the Elcan at 4 power. I will provide more after some range results. Oh, and by the way my buddy said he has never had a team member break an Elcan. It is heavy, but I am not sure what the NF plus the mount weighs. My guess is it is close.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    11,063
    Feedback Score
    41 (98%)
    FWIW if you put a cat tail on a variable like a Short-Dot they are very quick to change magnification, and if you have the front of the gun supported could easily do it keeping your finger on/near the trigger, and use your left to change magnification. Also the lever allows a quick reference as to what power its set to. 3 o'clock is 1.1X and 6 o'clock is 4X. Everyone who has tried mine setup this way wanted to know where to get one, and couldn't believe how easy it was.


    The 3 gunners developed them for quick magnification changes on the fly during competitions, and they work very nicely.



    I looked at the Elcan, and think its an excellent idea but the (possible) zero shift, and crappy mount turned me off. Ive had issues with ARM's mounts, and they have one of the worst reputations as far as mounts go. No way Id pay that much money for an optic where that was my only choice.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,612
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    The weight isn't that far off from an ACOG once you include the weight of a mount.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sopines, NC
    Posts
    1,759
    Feedback Score
    52 (100%)
    Really? If a TA31 is about 10oz without a mount, and if the mount weighs two or three ounces that still makes the SpectreDR about a pound heavier.
    Last edited by mkmckinley; 06-06-10 at 14:58.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,612
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mkmckinley View Post
    Really? A TA31 is about 10oz without a mount. If the mount weights two or three ounces that still puts the Spectre about a pound heavier.
    I weighed the two of them when I got my Elcan and I can't remember what the difference was.

    I saw people getting the weights of the Elcan and the ACOG off their respective sites and were comparing the two but did not realize the weight figure on Trijicon's site was for just the optic and did not include the mount.
    Last edited by EzGoingKev; 06-06-10 at 15:02.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    34
    Feedback Score
    0
    Been using 1 in Afganland now for about 3 months with no shift in poi between the x1 and x4. Honestly I think it is a pretty solid optic other than the risk of using ARMs mounts. Personaly I have always been a EOtech guy, but as 90% of our engagments take place at past 250m it makes sense to have a magnifier.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    413
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I'm a civilian and have had a Specter DR a year mounted to Noveske middy.

    * It is heavy (24oz) and the ARMS mounts do suck. I have had to shim the mount system to keep it tight. It seems fine now.

    * It is expensive, but I got a very good deal on a NIB one last year - model was the latest rev as of spring 2009. I lucked out there.

    * The glass is very good - seems better than ACOG.

    * Eye relief is OK for those who practice nose-to-CH shooting and the FOV is quite generous on 1X

    * The BDC reticle is spot on so far up to 300 yards. I want to shoot it further and see if it holds true to 600 with heavier bullets.

    * The illumination options are great and my battery has lasted 1 year so far - kept on a lower illumination setting 24/7.

    * The zero does not wobble on mine, the elevation wheel lock works well.

    * I haven't looked for POI shift from 1X to 4X to closely because at closer ranges say out to 50 yards on 1X and 6MOA center dot I can hit whatever I need to hit. When I switch to 4X and shoot center dot or BDC it still hits. As such I have not noticed it to be an issue. Remember, this is a second focal plane reticle so I don't think the BDC retice will work properly on 1X - it is designed to work at 4X.
    Last edited by grunz; 06-07-10 at 20:44.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    173
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by EzGoingKev View Post
    It would seem some units have a greater POI shift than others.

    Here is mine at 25 yards -

    Did you zero the optic at 100 yrds in 4X?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    1,612
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by alaskacop View Post
    Did you zero the optic at 100 yrds in 4X?
    Yes sir, I did.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •