That's what I thought of when I read the book. I remember my brother talking to me about it as well, and saying something like "When you're compromised on a recon mission, I thought SOP was to abort? Not let your spotters go, then stay in the area."
Does anybody have any response to that?
We miss you, AC.
We miss you, ToddG.
POW-handling:
Should be adressed as part of Section 3 of the OPORD, Execution, in the sub-section called Coordinating Instructions -POW handling. Should not be something that is improvised if/when it happens during a mission, one should follow the plan.
You are obligated to bring POWs with you, or hand them over to MPs or other units, unless there are other factors that do not allow this. Then you can disarm them and let them go; the base principle is based on honor, and the released POWs are supposed to cease further fighting.
Recon elements will always face a dilemma with regards to this.
Actions on compromise:
This should be adressed as part of Section 3 of the OPORD, Execution, under the subsection called Coordinating Instructions - Abort Criteria.
Many different aspects must be adressed here. Soft compromise might have been on the Go-list. Soft compromise does not neccessarily mean that you must abort. Neither does contact with the enemy, if you are able to break contact.
Mission completion will always be the primary focus, but Abort criteria lists items that will help the commander to assess the likelyhood of mission success, thus knowing when to continue and when to abort; lost comms, casualties, compromise etc.
Last edited by Arctic1; 01-12-14 at 10:03.
It's not about surviving, it's about winning!
It seems like goat herders are what geese and dogs were in Vietnam in that they acted as early warning for the enemy and were/are a real PITA. The geese and dogs could be dispatched however.
It's become a instant response now when reading any mil related book and seeing the term "goat herder" shows my heart sinks expecting the op to be compromised.
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I don't care much for movies ,Hollywood garbage.
Didn't Marcus elaborate on this more in the book, or am I confusing it with my memory of him telling the story in person? Regardless, he's said that the issue wasn't taking the goat herders with them, it was the fact that they would in turn take the goats with them as well. The goats would follow the herders anywhere. If they tied I the herders up, that's where they'd stay and then people would come looking for their food when it went missing. If they took the goat herders with them to exfil, they'd be a four man element with three prisoners and a herd of braying animals with bells on their necks.
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”
-C S Lewis
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I saw the movie last night. My problem is (and it's with me), that I pay to much attention to details, to a fault sometimes....when I'm interested is something that is. My dad always said that if I paid half as much attention or gave a third the effort to my school work when I was a kid as I did to cars, trucks, atv's, dirt bikes, snowmobiles, guns and other stuff I was interested in, I could've gotten an academic scholarship. I don't know about that one dad. I just read both books. Finished Lone Survivor two weeks ago and I'm on the last chapter (#24 Links in the Chains) of Service now.
I'm not a book reader at all. I have to really be interested in something to read a book about it. So I've always heard that "the movie will be different then the book was". And I was surprised at how much different the two were. At first it seemed to be going the same way, until after the gunfight. Then it was a lot different then both books. Before the movie was released, everyone involved in making it made a huge deal as to how real it was and how Marcus was there to call BS when ever something wasn't right. It makes me wonder why Marcus let there be such a difference between the books and the movie. It was more then just differences to make it fit a certain time frame so it wasn't to long.
I'm not at all, in any way saying anything bad about the operation itself or anyone involved in it. I'm saying it was a let down for me because I was expecting to see a certain set of events and saw something different. In some cases a lot different.
NYH1.
Last edited by NYH1; 01-13-14 at 02:30. Reason: To change "curtain to certain"
Take nothing I say personal, remember....it's just the interweb!
ROLLTIDE!
Fair Winds and Following Seas AC & IG!
New Yorkistan sucks.
NRA, NYSRPA, S.C.O.P.E. Member.
FUAC
I'll just leave this here.
http://hitthewoodline.com/patriotica...ivor-and-truth
OIF/OEF vet (Ramadi/Hit & Ghazni)
Former Army infantry squad leader
NRA Endowment Life Member
NR-EMT