Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 126

Thread: Photos of the British Army fielding new LMT .308

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Those are Royal Marine Commandos.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    US
    Posts
    2,709
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Those are Royal Marine Commandos.
    Any one that you know
    "Intelligence is not the ability to regurgitate information. It is the ability to make sound decisions on a consistent basis "--me

    "Just remember, when you are talking to the average person, you are talking to a television set"--RDJB

    One Big Ass Mistake America

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    9,328
    Feedback Score
    28 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by DMR View Post
    You know whats ironic about this. If the US Military had done this we would still be several YEARS from those rifles being in the field.
    If you think the British model is to be envied, you are completely wrong.
    The time from solicitation to deployment is comparable to the 416- proof that COTS can work. However, COTS is not a possible solution for service rifle replacement, though it is viable for low-density specialty buys, which is why that path has been followed for the past several decades.
    Jack Leuba
    Director of Sales
    Knight's Armament Company
    jleuba@knightarmco.com

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Northern NY
    Posts
    730
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    If you think the British model is to be envied, you are completely wrong.
    The time from solicitation to deployment is comparable to the 416- proof that COTS can work. However, COTS is not a possible solution for service rifle replacement, though it is viable for low-density specialty buys, which is why that path has been followed for the past several decades.
    That is true in a few instances, but I have been involved personaly in specialty applications for limited use specialized equipment that took a detour along they way and averaged 3 years from requirement to delivery. One of my special interest items, just went from a requirement to a Sources Sought. The requirement was identified by the field in 2006, with the "interium" solution perhaps going to the field next year(although we have a bridge of systems borrowed from Crane). This is for a very low density piece of specialized Infantry Kit. If the 416's are the USMC's IAR's I wold agree with that example, if you mean the CAG/AWG 416's that's a differant can and type of worms.

    That said I'm going to go on mute, since this is a off topic side bar.
    Last edited by DMR; 06-18-10 at 14:23.
    pro-patria.us

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,216
    Feedback Score
    17 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Those are Royal Marine Commandos.
    I thought "Commando" was a unit designation (like Team or Platoon) within the Royal Marines... This has always confused me.
    Scout Rider for the Mongol Hordes

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    152
    Feedback Score
    0
    Very awesome. I wonder if one of those might have been one that at one time was supposed to come to me. I am glad to get passed up so they can get them. I like that new multi cam. It was in a mag with the rifle a little different than what we get.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I was completely unaware of how utterly massive that model of Trijicon was. Gigantic.
    Last edited by thopkins22; 06-18-10 at 21:51.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    152
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by thopkins22 View Post
    I was completely unaware of how utterly massive that model of Trijicon was. Gigantic.
    Those 6x acogs are huge and very heavy. I would never want on of those.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    423
    Feedback Score
    20 (100%)
    Wow look at em! Especially with their Multicam. I would have gone for a variable optic.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    oregon
    Posts
    7,126
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    **** those guys.

    {jealousy}

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •