View Poll Results: Do you prefer a Tac Reload or a Retention Reload with an AR?

Voters
64. You may not vote on this poll
  • Tactical Reload

    28 43.75%
  • Retention Reload

    36 56.25%
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 100

Thread: Tactical Reloads VS Reloads with Retention

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)

    Tactical Reloads VS Reloads with Retention

    Before we start, I do not want to get into the merits of doing Tac Reloads VS Emergency reload (save that for another discussion).

    Question: Are Reloads with Retention better than Tactical Reloads?

    For those that do not know the difference, here is a quick down and dirty explanation:

    Tactical Reloads:

    1. Shooter first grabs new (fully loaded) mag.
    2. Then, while holding the new mag in their offhand, acquires the mag that is in the weapon.
    3. Shooter releases the mag that is in the weapon and inserts the new mag and retains the partially spent mag (dump pouch, etc).

    Reload with Retention:

    1. Shooter first grabs the mag that is in the weapon with their offhand.
    2. Then the shooter puts the partially used mag in a dump pouch, pocket, etc and grabs new (fully loaded) mag on the way back towards the weapon.
    3. Shooter inserts new mag into the weapon.

    Now that is covered, I will explain why I believe that reloads with retention are superior.

    As some of you know, we teach basic defensive pistol and carbine at the local gun club ([url]https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=53109[/url).
    Many of these shooters have NEVER had any training (other than what they have learned via the movies and TV). Last weekend, we got into the three types of mag changes (emergency, tactical and retention). When we started the tactical reloads, there were mags being dropped, falling out of weapons and being held onto while firing the weapon. In fact, I would say that more than 70% of the 20 shooters had some issue with dropping a mag at one point or another. They all thought that it was a difficult skill to do well (under speed) and found that they did not have a lot of control and power while trying to insert the new magazine.

    We then moved onto reloads with retention. This worked out MUCH better with only one dropped mag out of the bunch. Because they only had one mag in their hand at any one time, they felt that they had much more control of the mag and inserting it into the weapon.

    At the end of the class, I did a poll and asked the students if they were under stress, muddy, bloody, etc, which reload type would they go to. They all answered reload with retention.

    Anyone else use this form of reload VS tactical reload???


    C4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,956
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Breaking down the two, both require only one trip to the body. The tactical reload requires more fine motor skills to manipulate the hand to hold the fresh mag while unloading the pistol and then vice versa. The retention method requires less dexterity.

    I use the retention method. Reload time is less than two seconds wearing concealment garment.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    I go where I'm told.
    Posts
    2,167
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    For the same reasons singlestack wonder listed, I prefer reloading with retention. I'll add... for the retention method, your support had is usually already on the weapon... so going for the mag in the well to be retained, dumping it, grabbing the new mag, and inserting it is more natural and takes one less step. A quick breakdown...
    Reload with retention: hand to mag in magwell to pouch to mag to magwell.
    Tac reload: hand to mag on body, to mag in magwell, old mag out, new mag in, old mag to retention.
    In theory, it's not too many more steps but, as singlestack put it, requires more motor skills.
    Acta Non Verba

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    NoVA
    Posts
    1,114
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    Always used reload with retention. Why changes what works. Less going on in the hand = less chance of mistake/drops. Just my 2 cents.
    "Buy once, cry once. Or not. Many of you will undoubtedly be zombies one day. I'd prefer if you were zombies with sub-par gear."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rated21R View Post
    Always used reload with retention. Why changes what works. Less going on in the hand = less chance of mistake/drops. Just my 2 cents.
    Agree, but I will tell you that a lot of instructors ONLY teach the Tactical Reload and I know many shooters that do not like the reload with retention.


    C4

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    I go where I'm told.
    Posts
    2,167
    Feedback Score
    15 (100%)
    Rated brings up a good point, too. One mag in the hand at a time. Most don't necessarily have a hard time with tac reloads but most will find reloading with retention to be simpler.
    Acta Non Verba

  7. #7
    VMI-MO Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    When we started the tactical reloads, there were mags being dropped, falling out of weapons and being held onto while firing the weapon. In fact, I would say that more than 70% of the 20 shooters had some issue with dropping a mag at one point or another.
    I would not base my technique choice off of what a group of novices find it easier to do.

    Yes the tac reload can be quite bumbly, it takes practice to get it right, not something you can just pick up and do.


    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    They all thought that it was a difficult skill to do well (under speed) and found that they did not have a lot of control and power while trying to insert the new magazine.
    While yes you want to do it fast, a tac reload/reload with retention is done when you have time, opportunity and cover. So speed while still a top priority does not need to be as stressed. That being said, both types of reloads for mysef clock in at the same time.

    A tactical reload IMHO is superior because it leaves you with only one round in the gun for a shorter period of time, in case all that time/opportunity/cover goes away.

    During a reload with retention, as you stated, you remove the mag, leaving one round in the gun. You move down stow the old mag, acquire a new one, and send it home.

    With a tac reload the old mag comes out, new one goes in. There is a much smaller amount of time you only have 1rd in the gun.

    Is all this one round in the gun that important? Maybe, I dont know, but I prefer to have bullets in my gun as fast as possible.

    As for the people having trouble seating mags, not to be an asshole, but tell them to practice this, eat steak and go to the gym.


    PJ

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    153
    Feedback Score
    0
    To address fine motor skills, I've had an instructor who thought the difference between fine motor skills and gross motor skills was minimal in a gun fight. The previous argument I've heard is that all fine motor skills go out the window in a high stress situation, so you should focus on gross motor skills when operating your weapon (clearing jams, etc). This other instructor indicated that pulling the trigger, hitting the mag release and hitting the slide release (or ping-pong for rifles) are all fine motor skills. If those went out the window, then you wouldn't be able to do any of those things. Bottom line is probably training.

    I will also mention this was in the context of a pistol class and I haven't had nearly as much training or experience as others here with a pistol and I have no rifle experience at this point, as I've yet to get it out to the range.
    I've got a bunch of survival guides on my Kindle, so I'm ready for an EMP.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by VMI-MO View Post
    I would not base my technique choice off of what a group of novices find it easier to do.

    Yes the tac reload can be quite bumbly, it takes practice to get it right, not something you can just pick up and do.
    Oh I am not. The point about showing what new shooters did was to illustrate that it is a much harder skill to perform. This was of course on a flat range without anyone shooting at you.

    I have been doing reloads with retention for YEARS and believe that under stress, most folks will screw up a tac reload. Couple that with that fact that very few gun owners will ever practice tac reloads, reloads with retention are the way to go.




    While yes you want to do it fast, a tac reload/reload with retention is done when you have time, opportunity and cover. So speed while still a top priority does not need to be as stressed. That being said, both types of reloads for mysef clock in at the same time.

    A tactical reload IMHO is superior because it leaves you with only one round in the gun for a shorter period of time, in case all that time/opportunity/cover goes away.
    This above statement contradicts your other statement (FYI). You only do a tac reload when you are behind COVER and have TIME to do so. You are NOT going to do this reload IF you believe there is even a small chance that you will have to shoot someone in the next 3 seconds.





    As for the people having trouble seating mags, not to be an asshole, but tell them to practice this, eat steak and go to the gym.


    PJ
    This is not the answer. There were no 90lbs weaklings in the class. The majority of them were blue collar workers.



    C4
    Last edited by C4IGrant; 06-29-10 at 11:24.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,630
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by lethal dose View Post
    Rated brings up a good point, too. One mag in the hand at a time. Most don't necessarily have a hard time with tac reloads but most will find reloading with retention to be simpler.
    Correct. "Super Dave" Harrington discussed in length (at a carbine class) about doing reloads with retention and why this method served him well in the SF.



    C4

Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •