Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Pure wound trauma comparison

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    135
    Feedback Score
    0

    Pure wound trauma comparison

    I was looking at the -Home Defense Long Guns- sticky and noticed that 12 ga buck beats out 5.56 in pure wound trama at close range. Where does 7.62x39 (Hornady's 123-grain Spire Point ,VMAX, and the rest of the high end good stuff), 6.8x43, and .308 fit into the mix? I'm guessing .308 beats out 6.8x43 and 7.62x39 but is 00 buck above, below, or equal to 6.8x43 and 7.62x39?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duty station here....duty station there...
    Posts
    661
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    If you are strickly looking at home defense, then the 12 gauge is ideal. It has relatively low penetration through home materials, generates a lot of tissue damage, and the shot pattern helps to make up for lack of shot precision(IE, a torso shot with buck is more likely to hit something important than a 7.62). It's much harder to hit someone who may be moving around in low light than you think. Probably why the shotgun is still widely used around the world even though it is a pretty ancient weapon design.
    "A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." -Ecclesiastes 10:2

    Glock Armorer
    Sig Sauer Armorer
    Colt M16/M4 Armorer
    Remington 870/11-87 Armorer
    Firearms Instructor

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,343
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post

    If you are strickly looking at home defense, then the 12 gauge is ideal. It has relatively low penetration through home materials . . .
    False.




    Courtesy of DocGKR.
    Last edited by Molon; 07-13-10 at 00:20.
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I think this is being over-thought. Any of the listed rounds would wreck a bad guy if properly placed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Molon View Post
    False.
    I'm not sure that quoting the results of bullets in a flesh medium is really the right example to use when countering an argument about penetration in building materials.

    Luckily the Box of truth tests building materials:
    5.56 versus 12 gauge. That shows lower penetration from the 12 gauge than most handguns and 5.56...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tpd223 View Post
    I think this is being over-thought. Any of the listed rounds would wreck a bad guy if properly placed.
    +1, use the platform you are comfortable with. I am just as likely to use a 12 gauge or 6.8 SPC and wouldn't hesitate using one of my 5.56's...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    481
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GPalmer View Post
    I'm not sure that quoting the results of bullets in a flesh medium is really the right example to use when countering an argument about penetration in building materials.

    Luckily the Box of truth tests building materials:
    5.56 versus 12 gauge. That shows lower penetration from the 12 gauge than most handguns and 5.56...
    Please actually READ what Molon posted before starting to type again!

    The photo clearly states "TYPICAL WOUND PROFILE AFTER PENETRATING INTERIOR WALL INTERMEDIATE BARRIER
    "Doc, can you check out this thing I got?"
    -Every Marine, ever.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    64
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tampam4 View Post
    Please actually READ what Molon posted before starting to type again!

    The photo clearly states "TYPICAL WOUND PROFILE AFTER PENETRATING INTERIOR WALL INTERMEDIATE BARRIER
    Please actually READ what Molon was replying to before posting again. The OP said"relatively low penetration through home materials"
    molon responded with an assessment of how rounds penetrated in gel. Gel is not building material. I linked to tests against building materials.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Tampa, Florida
    Posts
    481
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by GPalmer View Post
    Please actually READ what Molon was replying to before posting again. The OP said"relatively low penetration through home materials"
    molon responded with an assessment of how rounds penetrated in gel. Gel is not building material. I linked to tests against building materials.
    OK....the image shows penetration of gel AFTER it has penetrated an intermediate barrier. What that image shows is that after going through an interior wall, 12 gauge penetrates ballistic gel nearly just as much as the other projectiles listed. So 12 gauge does NOT offer relatively low penetration through home materials. 12 gauge penetrated your building material just as much as the others, and THEN penetrated the gel.
    "Doc, can you check out this thing I got?"
    -Every Marine, ever.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    135
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm not factoring in household materials. I was just looking for straight shots and the possible/average damage done.

    Oh, and I fully get the low light moving target bit. Its hard enough to hit it on a semi lit range with the target only moving forwards or backward at fast walk speeds. Not to mention the possibility of the target shooting back! I guess I'm settling on a HD shottie since it seems the best. Kinda a one trick pony but a good one.
    Last edited by kh86; 07-15-10 at 15:18.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •