I've never had it happen, and I'm mindful. I don't have an RSO following me around, so I tend to be my own. You know?
Ok, but I didn't arrive at the same understanding from the very limited description I see above. If that's the case, then it makes more sense, but yes the RSO failed him.I don't believe he was transitioning that way. It sounds like he was doing the same thing we do, which is load and make ready the pistol and holster, then load and make ready the carbine. He started out shooting the carbine and then took a step which pulled the holster and shirt in opposite directions and he got shot.
I guarantee that if foot was one little toe over the box you'd get a penalty, or don't set a gun down exactly right, or move a barricade slightly, etc -- but the RSO can't see shirt in holster? Yeah, not good.
Whatever the case is, re-holstering is usually very deliberate act for me. I see or feel any un-tucking of anything around my gun and it gets squared away RFN.
"I'm not saying I invented the turtleneck. But I was the first person to realize its potential as a tactical garment. The tactical turtleneck! The... tactleneck! - Sterling Archer"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important
than one's fear. The timid presume it is lack of fear that allows the brave to act when the timid do not."
Agreed. I am in no way letting the shooter off the hook. He showed up with shitty equipment and incompatible attire and how he has two holes in his leg. But the SO still failed. If we simply trusted the shooters to run themselves at all times we'd attach the timer to a stick (which is about all the worth many SOs really are: a stick to hold the timer).
Unfortunately one of the side-effects of having a nanny (or in this case, RO) that you expect to be watching over you is that you get complacent. This is true in life as it is in shooting.
I've been an IDPA SO for well over 5 years, run hundreds if not thousands of shooters, worked local and state matches, etc. Believe me when I say I have LOTS of opinions on the level of stupidity I've witnessed on both ends of the timer. I once watched an SO following a very unstable shooter while trying to hold the timer and a camera.
I see now
Without the link to the original thread it's hard to say, but it does sound like they were transitioning from a hot pistol to a hot carbine. Stupid. Height of stupid. Asking someone to holster a hot gun on the clock is pure idiocy.he shot the handgun and reholstered into a Serpa clone type holster and got some T-Shirt into the holster, he transitioned to his M-16 and when he took the first step, the shirt pulled taught and pulled the trigger.
now I want a link to the original thread so I make sure I don't attend one of these events.
This looks to be the original thread but still no insight.
http://smith-wessonforum.com/smith-w...afety-add.html
Friend's explanation:
Picture of said friend with dual G18s.It was in an action match, he shot the handgun and reholstered into a Serpa clone type holster and got some T-Shirt into the holster, he transitioned to his M-16 and when he took the first step, the shirt pulled taught and pulled the trigger. The gun cycled and reloaded another round in the holster, had it been the Glock 18 on full auto it would have ate his leg, or a duty round rather than FMJ.
Last edited by Irish; 07-22-10 at 10:59.
So the guy who got shot is a friend of David Hineline? Interesting.
ETA: Haha, I just checked the original thread, and sure enough, it is David Hineline's friend.
Last edited by SHIVAN; 07-22-10 at 12:10.
"I'm not saying I invented the turtleneck. But I was the first person to realize its potential as a tactical garment. The tactical turtleneck! The... tactleneck! - Sterling Archer"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important
than one's fear. The timid presume it is lack of fear that allows the brave to act when the timid do not."
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks