Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Why the .45GAP? What am I missing?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Utah, USA
    Posts
    1,520
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Have you ever seen a Glock 21?
    "The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." John Steinbeck

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    334
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Entropy View Post
    The G37 has more snap to it than the .40S&W as it is a more powerful cartridge shoved into a 9mm action. I'd rather use .40S&W than the .45gap.
    I must disagree. In the same size Glock pistols, the .45GAP has less snap to it than the .40S&W. The .40S&W in the Glock pistols is the worst as far as snappy recoil goes. The .40S&W has about 10-20% more energy at the muzzle than the .45GAP. I for one actually like the .45GAP. Mind you, I have 5 times as many .45ACP pistols as I do .45GAP pistols.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,857
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MarshallDodge View Post
    Have you ever seen a Glock 21?
    Many times. Have you?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duty station here....duty station there...
    Posts
    661
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Exiledviking View Post
    I must disagree. In the same size Glock pistols, the .45GAP has less snap to it than the .40S&W. The .40S&W in the Glock pistols is the worst as far as snappy recoil goes. The .40S&W has about 10-20% more energy at the muzzle than the .45GAP. I for one actually like the .45GAP. Mind you, I have 5 times as many .45ACP pistols as I do .45GAP pistols.
    Comparable sectional density loadings. Compare mild shooting 230gr GAP loadings to 180gr .40 loadings and they have similar recoil characteristics which is closer to .45acp.......a slow push. However, in split times and side by side comparison I routinely shot faster with the .40S&W. Then of course you have only 10+1 rounds in the GAP versus 15+1 in the .40 with a pistol of the same size.

    If you are using 155gr .40, then yes it is snappy. Fewer and fewer agencies are using the 155gr loading though and the standard is shifting to the 180gr. FBI, DEA, ATF, ICE, BP, DOI, USCG,.....just to name a few agencies converting entirely to the 180gr loading.
    "A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." -Ecclesiastes 10:2

    Glock Armorer
    Sig Sauer Armorer
    Colt M16/M4 Armorer
    Remington 870/11-87 Armorer
    Firearms Instructor

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    16
    Feedback Score
    0
    According to a bud at FHP, the academy did ballistics tests and found the .45GAP to be superior to the .40. They also supposedly had some failure to stop with the .40. (in my area we have had numerous shootings with the .40 from Sig P229 and Glock 22 since '93. The vast majority of shootings have proved to be fatal and I am aware of only one failure to stop even though she did drop the pistol so it de-escilated. FHP just shot and killed a suicidal man in a shootout with the Beretta 96G a couple of weeks ago without issue. I got to review the detailed reports of the neighboring county's sheriff's office shootings in 2001. I got to look at the recovered rounds and had full access to the detailed report of the shooting because our training director, a retired FBI SAC reviewed the shootings at the request of the states attorneys office. I was our range master and got to review the files as well. The
    .40 Ranger SXT had excellent results. At the time we had gone with the FBIs 165gr Ranger SXT (a former training officer stuck us with it) and we got rid of it after failure to penetrate a windshield at hood range and 90 degree angle. The round shed it's jacket and the lead core went into the bad guys shoulder shallow enough that he plucked it out and only needed a band aid to fix the wound. I was the arresting officer on that one. We then went to the 180gr SXT and had 1 shot stops in 3 shootings with one being fatal. I don't know where the FHP is getting failure to stop except with piss poor shot placement with the .40? Besides I had much rather have the 15 extra rounds you'll carry over the GAP. (3 mags of 15 rds vs 3 mags of 10 rds) I just see the GAP as a solution looking for a problem to address. If you want .45acp get a Glock 21sf!

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    According to a bud at FHP, the academy did ballistics tests and found the .45GAP to be superior to the .40. They also supposedly had some failure to stop with the .40.
    I guess, "as long as the caliber starts with the number 4", will only apply to the .45 from now on .

    The caliber debates never end. One would think that if agency 'A' finds a load effective, then agency 'B', 'C' and 'D' would obtain the same result.

    At least this exercise in splitting hairs benefits the firearms industry.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Duty station here....duty station there...
    Posts
    661
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ssarge View Post
    According to a bud at FHP, the academy did ballistics tests and found the .45GAP to be superior to the .40. They also supposedly had some failure to stop with the .40
    Well.....yeah. Of course the .45 caliber does better in FBI protocols than the .40. Bigger wound volume, and more momentum to go through things like windshields. However, even in comparison to the 9mm the differences are SOOOOO minor. Penetration is the key component, and with modern ammo they all are about equal.

    Give FHP enough time, and they will suffer failures to stop with the .45. However, they won't blame it on the caliber in this case, because they cannot viably go any bigger. Having failures to stop with the 9mm or .40 gives the agency a scape goat to blame their hardware(caliber). It's easy to say that there is a hardware problem, and then correct it with an upgrade. In reality, the problem was likely that the bullets were not hitting the right areas.....which is a software issue. You cannot fix a software problem with a hardware solution.......and sometimes you just fricken can't get the bullets to go where you need them to based on your scenario.
    Last edited by Entropy; 08-13-10 at 23:48.
    "A wise man's heart inclines him to the right, but a fool's heart to the left." -Ecclesiastes 10:2

    Glock Armorer
    Sig Sauer Armorer
    Colt M16/M4 Armorer
    Remington 870/11-87 Armorer
    Firearms Instructor

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    1,857
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BuckskinJoe View Post
    The .45 GAP is a solution desperately in search of a problem.
    The problem, of course, is that the .45 GAP has no real advantages over the .45 ACP, and ammunition availability is minuscule compared to the .45 ACP.

    The .45 GAP has, essentially, no chance of being successful in the markekplace.
    From a dept/LEO perspective or from a civilian perspective?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    4,922
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jmart View Post
    From a dept/LEO perspective or from a civilian perspective?
    I am going out on a realy thick limb and venture both.

    As Buckskin Joe said: it is a solution in search of a problem.

    The problem is the problem was Gaston Glock's ego.

    As I quoted Rand Simberg, an Aerospace Engineer, in another thread:

    "A good engineer solves a problem, a great one avoids it."

    The GAP falls in the former, the Glock 21SF falls in the latter.
    Last edited by Heavy Metal; 08-14-10 at 00:22.
    My brother saw Deliverance and bought a Bow. I saw Deliverance and bought an AR-15.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    249
    Feedback Score
    0
    Give FHP enough time, and they will suffer failures to stop with the .45. However, they won't blame it on the caliber in this case, because they cannot viably go any bigger
    Well, they could try to locate a cache of those .577 revolvers the British made a hundred years ago......

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •