Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 99

Thread: MK318 Mod 0 - accuracy evaluation and chronograph data

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,518
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    That is some great stuff there Molon, thanks for taking the time!
    Last edited by Ned Christiansen; 09-09-10 at 23:23.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    620
    Feedback Score
    0
    I though Mk318 was sopposed to be rated at having 2moa accuracy standard.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    125
    Feedback Score
    0
    Molon,

    Great evaluation. Thanks for posting this!

    It seems like both the velocity and accuracy are right on the edge of the allowable spec(Although I haven't gone to look up the info yet... will do later today). Do you think this was reject ammo? It sure would explain the unexpected availability...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Fayetteville, NC
    Posts
    2,146
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Great info Molon. I have definitely learned a lot from this thread.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    786
    Feedback Score
    0
    Thanks Molon! outstanding report and very educative as usual.

    Hola Ned! Great to see you here.

    Ruben

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    UT
    Posts
    2,044
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by littlejerry View Post
    Do you think this was reject ammo? It sure would explain the unexpected availability...
    I was thinking the same. So far commercial sales of this ammo has been available only from one outfit, without explanation to their sources. I bought some, and visually I can't see any issues with ammo - obviously, visual eval provides little meaningful info.

    Molon, thank you for taking your time and sharing, your post are always top-notch.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Allen, Texas
    Posts
    660
    Feedback Score
    0
    I also thank you and would love for the group measurement methodology to be "stickyed" for future reference!
    Colt's Manufacturing Company Armorer Instructor

    Aimpoint USA ProStaff

    www.hardwiredtacticalshooting.com

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    620
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    I was thinking the same. So far commercial sales of this ammo has been available only from one outfit, without explanation to their sources. I bought some, and visually I can't see any issues with ammo - obviously, visual eval provides little meaningful info.

    Molon, thank you for taking your time and sharing, your post are always top-notch.
    I've noticed a little bit of variation in the setting of the round. Have you seen that at all?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1,521
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by littlejerry View Post
    Molon,

    Do you think this was reject ammo?
    I just shoot the stuff. I'm afraid you're going to have to ask Federal about its pedigree.


    .....
    Last edited by Molon; 09-11-10 at 13:46.
    All that is necessary for trolls to flourish, is for good men to do nothing.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,751
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    I suppose it would be difficult to making a consistent accurate bullet with that type of bullet construction. Especially when the lead core is loose in the jacket.
    Last edited by vicious_cb; 09-11-10 at 18:24.

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •