|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last edited by NickB; 09-13-10 at 02:51.
--Nick
Owner, Reptilia & Side Project, LLC
You're just mad at me for trying to get him to buy VLTOR shit
If Nick says H2 works, its good to go. I'm just trying to get ya'll to ditch the musket barrels and move into this century.
I've not tested the Vltor system, but I know the Canadians have no issue with their C7A2 rifles, which use HH buffers. Even the Army's (questionable) test results that I've seen show the 20" barrel M16 with various carbine buffers to be more reliable than the standard issue M4. I take serious issue with their test procedures, but those details aren't suited for this conversation.
--Nick
Owner, Reptilia & Side Project, LLC
I meant the old VLTOR modstock, they are on closeout. The new A5 stock looks kinda cool. I seem to recall telling someone a long, long time ago that a mid length buffer system would be cool. But no, that was a dumb idea apparently! But I wanted it in a fixed stock. Hint hint.
Rifles really do things that shouldn't be possible, like run with bad ammo and shit mags and loose keys. There is something to be said for that good old fashioned long gas system.
BTW Nick, my SAW rifle has an H2 buffer in it, I thought Colts were marked HH?
Last edited by RyanB; 09-13-10 at 03:39.
RyanB, I would like nothing more but it is not in the cards as far as funding. My own guns are all carbine length or mid-length 14.5 or 16" barrels.
Then your best bet is to get HH buffers like Nick says. I would still make a list of allowable modifications, or let officers use their own uppers. Whatever pushes the cost onto the officer, if he wishes to use something other than what is issued.
Haha no shit Nick, I mean that I was told ALL Colt buffers were HH marked instead of H2.
Although I've seen a Diemaco 6920, its just H equipped like any other.
Bookmarks