Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: Surefire Mini Can vs Micro Can

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    621
    Feedback Score
    0

    Surefire Mini Can vs Micro Can

    Besides size what is the difference between the two? They have the same decibel reading.

    I am thinking about buying one of these. Is there any good info out on them. I did a search here and on google and there doesn't seem to be too much?

    Thx

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    NM
    Posts
    3,988
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)
    [Edited for dreadful reading comprehension]
    I was thinking 212 vs Mini - didn't realize you were comparing the two smaller ones.

    I would expect the Micro to be fairly close to the OPS M4S for performance (20dB drop at best), but comparing the micro and M4S isn't really an apples-apples comparison (QD muzzle attached vs. budget reflex thread-on) - I really need to read up on this and then provide input...
    Last edited by TehLlama; 09-22-10 at 04:37.
    عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
    کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
    Semper Fi
    "Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    621
    Feedback Score
    0
    "I see no reason not to go with the Mini all things considered - it gives up some performance, but firing supersonic cartridges it handles the rest."

    Do you by chance mean micro? The Mini is 5 inches long the micro is 4 inches long. Both small.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    449
    Feedback Score
    25 (100%)
    Just following up. Anyone have experience with the Micro? I've got the 212 and have been considering a Mini but it appears the Micro has the same basic performance on 16 inch carbines (for which it would be used in my case).
    Any info would be appreciated. Both the Micro and Mini cost about the same.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,446
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    You might call SF or LaRue and ask them. I shot the Mini and the 212 side by side at the LaRue shoot on an OBR at 500yds with cans on and cans off the OBR to compare POI shift and went 10 for 10 with each can off and on at gongs not very scientific POI shift test, but SF made their point . I could not take the ear/pro off as too many guns on the line to check for sound differences. From what I understand they were not meant for SBRs but for carbine or longer guns. I'm interested to see what y'all find out in detail as I'm looking for a short can for a 14.5 & 16" bbls.
    "First gett'n shot, then gett'n married... baaaad habits"

    "If you're gonna subscribe to hero worship, at least worship a real hero."
    M4Guru

    Gal 2:20

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Clayton NC
    Posts
    19
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I am also very interested in the findings. I have a 10.5 because I want the shortest and lightest system with reasonable performance. I am very interested in the SF Micro to keep the system as short as possible. My goal would only to be able to shoot outside without hearing protection. Thanks and please keep me informed!

    SBB

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Free State of Nebraska
    Posts
    5,427
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I'd rather have a full size silencer.

    These short silencers that companies sell look cool but suck ass in the real world. They are too loud and get used up too fast.
    Last edited by scottryan; 11-09-10 at 21:40.
    "Not every thing on Earth requires an aftermarket upgrade." demigod/markm

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    60
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yea im actually planning on picking up a Suppressor pretty soon for my SBR.

    Even though the SF Micro might not last as long i really like its size, being that id like to keep my rifle short like soggy stated.

    But alot of people i speak to recommend the same thing that scott mentioned, to go with a full size Suppressor.

    Im gonna have to do a little more reading and thinking.
    High Speed - Low Drag - SBR Operator

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Posts
    24,902
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    Considering the cost involved I would seriously consider a Mini over a Micro. Unless you are going to use it sparingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by CAG - 516 View Post
    Yea im actually planning on picking up a Suppressor pretty soon for my SBR.

    Even though the SF Micro might not last as long i really like its size, being that id like to keep my rifle short like soggy stated.

    But alot of people i speak to recommend the same thing that scott mentioned, to go with a full size Suppressor.

    Im gonna have to do a little more reading and thinking.



    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,367
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Can I ask why you guys say the smaller can would not last as long?

    I just do not see how this is possible, as both cans are enduring the same muzzle blast; actually the longer can is containing more of the blast than the shorter.

    I think the stubby can is a great idea, if you know going into the game that you will be giving up some sound reduction for better handling. Before ANY small cans were on the US market, I heard Dean Caputo at a class wishing someone would make one for their 6933's, saying all he wanted was something that dropped the noise level down to that of the sidearm or quieter, that was small enough not to impede the use of the 6933 in their cruiser mounts, and not mess up the handling of the 6933. I personally tried to get someone I know in a major US suppressor company to run with the idea, but had no luck. Now they are all the rage. They actually make a lot of sense on the longer rifles where the muzzle blast is less than the carbine lengths. Instead of a fence post + 5", you have a fence post + 3-4".

    I plan on buying a mini for my SCAR 16 CQC.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •